Evaluation of Unsolicited Feedback from Patients with Cancer and Their Families as a Strategy to Improve Cancer Care Delivery

Author:

Fallah Parvaneh1ORCID,Clemons Lucas2,Bradbury Michelle1,Vandermeer Lisa2,Clemons Mark12ORCID,Renaud Julie3ORCID,Savard Marie-France12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada

2. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada

3. Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada

Abstract

Background: Unsolicited patient feedback (compliments and complaints) should allow the healthcare system to address and improve individual and overall patient, family, and staff experiences. We evaluated feedback at a tertiary cancer centre to identify potential areas for optimizing care delivery. Methods: unsolicited feedback submitted to the Patient Relations Department, relating to the Divisions of Medical and Radiation Oncology, at the Ottawa Hospital, was analyzed. Results: Of 580 individual reports submitted from 2016 to 2022, patient demographics were available for 97% (563/580). Median patient age was 65 years (range 17–101), and 53% (301/563) were female. The most common cancer types were breast (127/545, 23%) and gastrointestinal (119/545, 22%) malignancies, and most (64%, 311/486) patients had metastatic disease. Feedback was submitted mainly by patients (291/579, 50%), and predominantly negative (489/569, 86%). The main reasons for complaints included: communication (29%, 162/566) and attitude/conduct of care (28%, 159/566). While feedback rates were initially stable, an increase occurred from 2019 to 2021. Conclusions: Unsolicited feedback remains mostly negative, and relates to physician communication. If we are to drive meaningful changes in care delivery, more standardized means of assessing feedback and implementation strategies are needed. In addition, in an era of increased healthcare provider burnout, strategies to enhance formal positive feedback are also warranted.

Funder

Ottawa Hospital Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference18 articles.

1. Patient feedback and duration of treatment: A corpus-based analysis of written comments on cancer care in England;Brookes;Appl. Corpus Linguist.,2021

2. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness;Doyle;BMJ Open,2013

3. Using patient feedback to drive quality improvement in hospitals: A qualitative study;Berger;BMJ Open,2020

4. Unsolicited patient complaints among radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists;Raldow;Cancer,2021

5. Evaluation of Patient and Family Outpatient Complaints as a Strategy to Prioritize Efforts to Improve Cancer Care Delivery;Mack;Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3