A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Stevens Courtney J.1ORCID,Wechsler Stephen2,Ejem Deborah B.3ORCID,Khalidi Sarah3,Coffee-Dunning Jazmine3,Morency Jamme L.4,Thorp Karen E.4,Codini Megan E.2,Newman Robin M.5,Echols Jennifer3,Cloyd Danielle Z.3,dos Anjos Sarah6ORCID,Muse Colleen2,Gallups Sarah3,Goedeken Susan C.7,Flannery Kaitlin2,Bakitas Marie A.3,Hegel Mark T.1,Lyons Kathleen Doyle2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA

2. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129, USA

3. School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA

4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA

5. Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA

6. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA

7. Department of Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to conduct a process evaluation of intervention delivery for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (NCT 03915548). The RCT tested the effects of a telephone-delivered behavioral intervention on changes in breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with social roles and activities, as compared to an attention control condition. This process evaluation examined (a) fidelity monitoring scores; (b) participants’ perceived benefit ratings for gaining confidence, reducing distress, adjusting habits and routines, setting goals, and increasing exercise; and (c) field notes, email communications, and transcripts of coach supervision and debriefing sessions. The behavioral and attention control conditions were delivered with a high degree of fidelity (global quality rating score for the BA/PS condition was M = 4.6 (SD = 0.6) and M = 4.9 (SD = 0.3) for the attention control condition, where “5” is the highest rating). The behavioral intervention participants perceived greater benefits than the control participants pertaining to goal setting, t(248) = 5.73, p = <0.0001, adjusting habits and routines, t(248) = 2.94, p = 0.0036, and increasing exercise, t(248) = 4.66, p = <0.0001. Moreover, coaches’ perceptions regarding the behavioral intervention’s therapeutic aspects aligned with the study’s a priori conceptual model including the use of a structured process to set small, observable goals and facilitate the independent use of problem-solving skills. However, coaches also noted that aspects of the attention control condition, including the perceived relevance of the educational content and opportunities for social support, may have made it more therapeutically potent than intended. The pandemic may have affected the activity goals behavioral intervention participants could set as well as augmented the relevancy of social support provided in both conditions.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference49 articles.

1. Physical performance limitations and participation restrictions among cancer survivors: A population-based study;Ness;Ann. Epidemiol.,2006

2. World Health Organization (2002). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), World Health Organization.

3. Fan, R., Wang, L., Bu, X., Wang, W., and Zhu, J. (2023). Unmet supportive care needs of breast cancer survivors: A systematic scoping review. BMC Cancer, 23.

4. Rehabilitation following cancer treatment;Egan;Disabil. Rehabil.,2013

5. Methods to improve rehabilitation of patients following breast cancer surgery: A review of systematic reviews;Loh;Breast Cancer (Dove Med. Press),2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3