Appropriateness of Imaging for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer—Real World Data from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaboration (PURC)

Author:

Mercedes Raidizon1,Head Dennis1ORCID,Zook Elizabeth1,Eidelman Eric1,Tomaszewski Jeffrey2,Ginzburg Serge3,Uzzo Robert4,Smaldone Marc4,Danella John5,Guzzo Thomas J.6,Lee Daniel6,Belkoff Laurence7,Walker Jeffrey7,Reese Adam8,Shah Mihir S.9ORCID,Jacobs Bruce10,Raman Jay D.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA

2. Department of Urology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ 08103, USA

3. Department of Urology, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA

4. Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA

5. Department of Urology, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA 17822, USA

6. Department of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

7. MidLantic Urology, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19008, USA

8. Department of Urology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA

9. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

10. Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA

Abstract

Imaging for prostate cancer defines the extent of disease. Guidelines recommend against imaging low-risk prostate cancer patients with a computed tomography (CT) scan or bone scan due to the low probability of metastasis. We reviewed imaging performed for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer across the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC), a physician-led data sharing and quality improvement collaborative. The data of 10 practices were queried regarding the imaging performed in men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2015 to 2022. The cohort included 13,122 patients with 3502 (27%) low-risk, 2364 (18%) favorable intermediate-risk, 3585 (27%) unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 3671 (28%) high-risk prostate cancer, based on the AUA guidelines. Amongst the low-risk patients, imaging utilization included pelvic MRI (59.7%), bone scan (17.8%), CT (16.0%), and PET-based imaging (0.5%). Redundant imaging occurred in 1022 patients (29.2%). There was variability among the PURC sites for imaging used in the low-risk patients, and iterative education reduced the need for CT and bone scans. Approximately 15% of low-risk patients had staging imaging performed using either a CT or bone scan, and redundant imaging occurred in almost one-third of men. Such data underscore the need for continued guideline-based education to optimize the stewardship of resources and reduce unnecessary costs to the healthcare system.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3