Feasibility of Implementation and the Impact of a Digital Prehabilitation Service in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Oesophago-Gastric Cancer

Author:

Moorthy Krishna123ORCID,Halliday Laura J.1,Noor Nigel1,Peters Christopher J1ORCID,Wynter-Blyth Venetia3,Urch Catherine E2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London W2 1NY, UK

2. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK

3. Onkohealth Ltd., Edgware HA8 7EB, UK

Abstract

Background: Home-based and supervised prehabilitation programmes are shown to have a positive impact on outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer. The primary aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of delivering a digital prehabilitation service. Methods: Patients undergoing treatment for OG cancer with curative intent were recruited into the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients were offered a digital prehabilitation service. Following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions, patients were also offered both a hybrid clinic-based in-person service and a digital service. Implementation and clinical metrics from the two prehabilitation models were compared. Results: 31 of 41 patients accepted the digital service (75%). Of the people who started the digital programme, 3 dropped out (10%). Compliance with the weekly touchpoints was 86%, and the median length of programme was 12 weeks. Twenty-six patients enrolled in the in-person service. Two patients dropped out (10%). Average compliance to weekly touchpoints was 71%, and the median length of programme was 10 weeks. In the digital group, sit to stand (STS) increased from 14.5 (IQR 10.5–15.5) to 16 (IQR 16–22); p = 0.02. Median heart rate recovery (HRR) increased from 10.5 (IQR 7.5–14) to 15.5 (IQR 11–20) bpm; p = 0.24. There was a significant drop in distress (median 3 (IQR 0–5) to 1 (IQR 0–2); p = 0.04) and a small drop in anxiety (median 3 (0–5) to 2 (0–3); p = 0.22). There was no difference in the postoperative complication rate and length of hospital stay between the two groups. Discussion: This study has shown that digital prehabilitation can be delivered effectively to patients with OG cancer, with high engagement and retention rates. We observed improvements in some physical and psychological parameters with the digital service, with comparable clinical outcomes to the in-person service.

Funder

Innovate UK

NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference38 articles.

1. Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy;Low;Ann. Surg.,2019

2. Varagunam, M., Park, M.H., Sinha, S., Cromwell, D., Maynard, N., Crosby, T., Trudgill, N., Michalowski, J., Salvador, A., and Napper, R. (2022, March 22). National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit 2018. 2019. An Audit of the Care Received by People with Oesophago-Gastric Cancer in England and Wales 2018 Annual Report. March 2019. Available online: https://www.nogca.org.uk/content/uploads/2019/04/NOGCA-2018-Annual-Report-V2.pdf.

3. Outcomes in the management of esophageal cancer;Paul;J. Surg. Oncol.,2014

4. Doorakkers, E., Konings, P., Mattsson, F., Lagergren, J., and Brusselaers, N. (2015). Early Complications Following Oesophagectomy for Cancer in Relation to Long-Term Healthcare Utilisation: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study. PLoS ONE, 10.

5. Surgical complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in a nationwide Swedish cohort study;Lagergren;Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3