Feasibility of Implementation and the Impact of a Digital Prehabilitation Service in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Oesophago-Gastric Cancer
-
Published:2023-01-30
Issue:2
Volume:30
Page:1673-1682
-
ISSN:1718-7729
-
Container-title:Current Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Current Oncology
Author:
Moorthy Krishna123ORCID, Halliday Laura J.1, Noor Nigel1, Peters Christopher J1ORCID, Wynter-Blyth Venetia3, Urch Catherine E2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London W2 1NY, UK 2. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK 3. Onkohealth Ltd., Edgware HA8 7EB, UK
Abstract
Background: Home-based and supervised prehabilitation programmes are shown to have a positive impact on outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer. The primary aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of delivering a digital prehabilitation service. Methods: Patients undergoing treatment for OG cancer with curative intent were recruited into the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients were offered a digital prehabilitation service. Following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions, patients were also offered both a hybrid clinic-based in-person service and a digital service. Implementation and clinical metrics from the two prehabilitation models were compared. Results: 31 of 41 patients accepted the digital service (75%). Of the people who started the digital programme, 3 dropped out (10%). Compliance with the weekly touchpoints was 86%, and the median length of programme was 12 weeks. Twenty-six patients enrolled in the in-person service. Two patients dropped out (10%). Average compliance to weekly touchpoints was 71%, and the median length of programme was 10 weeks. In the digital group, sit to stand (STS) increased from 14.5 (IQR 10.5–15.5) to 16 (IQR 16–22); p = 0.02. Median heart rate recovery (HRR) increased from 10.5 (IQR 7.5–14) to 15.5 (IQR 11–20) bpm; p = 0.24. There was a significant drop in distress (median 3 (IQR 0–5) to 1 (IQR 0–2); p = 0.04) and a small drop in anxiety (median 3 (0–5) to 2 (0–3); p = 0.22). There was no difference in the postoperative complication rate and length of hospital stay between the two groups. Discussion: This study has shown that digital prehabilitation can be delivered effectively to patients with OG cancer, with high engagement and retention rates. We observed improvements in some physical and psychological parameters with the digital service, with comparable clinical outcomes to the in-person service.
Funder
Innovate UK NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Reference38 articles.
1. Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy;Low;Ann. Surg.,2019 2. Varagunam, M., Park, M.H., Sinha, S., Cromwell, D., Maynard, N., Crosby, T., Trudgill, N., Michalowski, J., Salvador, A., and Napper, R. (2022, March 22). National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit 2018. 2019. An Audit of the Care Received by People with Oesophago-Gastric Cancer in England and Wales 2018 Annual Report. March 2019. Available online: https://www.nogca.org.uk/content/uploads/2019/04/NOGCA-2018-Annual-Report-V2.pdf. 3. Outcomes in the management of esophageal cancer;Paul;J. Surg. Oncol.,2014 4. Doorakkers, E., Konings, P., Mattsson, F., Lagergren, J., and Brusselaers, N. (2015). Early Complications Following Oesophagectomy for Cancer in Relation to Long-Term Healthcare Utilisation: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study. PLoS ONE, 10. 5. Surgical complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in a nationwide Swedish cohort study;Lagergren;Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.,2012
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|