Detecting Deception Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning in Datasets on COVID-19 and Climate Change

Author:

Brzic Barbara1,Boticki Ivica1,Bagic Babac Marina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Deception in computer-mediated communication represents a threat, and there is a growing need to develop efficient methods of detecting it. Machine learning models have, through natural language processing, proven to be extremely successful at detecting lexical patterns related to deception. In this study, four selected machine learning models are trained and tested on data collected through a crowdsourcing platform on the topics of COVID-19 and climate change. The performance of the models was tested by analyzing n-grams (from unigrams to trigrams) and by using psycho-linguistic analysis. A selection of important features was carried out and further deepened with additional testing of the models on different subsets of the obtained features. This study concludes that the subjectivity of the collected data greatly affects the detection of hidden linguistic features of deception. The psycho-linguistic analysis alone and in combination with n-grams achieves better classification results than an n-gram analysis while testing the models on own data, but also while examining the possibility of generalization, especially on trigrams where the combined approach achieves a notably higher accuracy of up to 16%. The n-gram analysis proved to be a more robust method during the testing of the mutual applicability of the models while psycho-linguistic analysis remained most inflexible.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Computational Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Numerical Analysis,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference20 articles.

1. Lying in Everyday Life;DePaulo;J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.,1996

2. A comparison of classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication;Zhou;J. Manag. Inf. Syst.,2004

3. Hancock, J.T., Curry, L., Goorha, S., and Woodworth, M. (2005, January 3–6). Automated linguistic analysis of deceptive and truthful synchronous computer-mediated communication. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA.

4. Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., and Hancock, J.T. (2011, January 19–24). Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, OR, USA.

5. Feng, S., Banerjee, R., and Choi, Y. (2012, January 8–14). Syntactic stylometry for deception detection. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3