Abstract
Conventionally, plastic anisotropy is calibrated by using standard uniaxial tensile and biaxial test results. Alternatively, heterogeneous strain field specimens in combination with full-field measurements can be used for this purpose. As reported by the literature, such an approach reduces the number of required tests enormously, but it is challenging to obtain reliable results. This paper presents an alternative methodology, which represents a compromise between the conventional and heterogeneous strain field calibration technique. The idea of the method is to use simple tests, which can be conducted on the uniaxial testing machine, and to avoid the use of advanced measuring equipment. The procedure is accomplished by conducting standard tensile tests, which are simple and reliable, and by a novel heterogeneous strain field tensile test, to calibrate the biaxial stress state. Moreover, only two of the parameters required for full characterisation need to be inversely identified from the test response; the other parameters are directly determined from the uniaxial tensile test results. This way, a dimension of optimization space is reduced substantially, which increases the robustness and effectiveness of the optimization algorithm.
Funder
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Subject
General Materials Science,Metals and Alloys
Reference51 articles.
1. Sheet Metal Forming Processes: Constitutive Modelling and Numerical Simulation;Banabic,2010
2. An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets
3. ISO 6892-1—Metallic Materials—Tensile Testing—Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature,2019
4. ISO 10113—Metallic Materials—Sheet and Strip—Determination of Plastic Strain Ratio,2006
5. ISO 16808—Determination of Biaxial Stress-Strain Curve by Means of Bulge Test with Optical Measuring System,2013
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献