Thermal Conditions in Indoor Environments: Exploring the Reasoning behind Standard-Based Recommendations

Author:

Berger Christiane1ORCID,Mahdavi Ardeshir2,Ampatzi Eleni3ORCID,Crosby Sarah4ORCID,Hellwig Runa1ORCID,Khovalyg Dolaana5,Pisello Anna67ORCID,Roetzel Astrid8,Rysanek Adam9,Vellei Marika10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Human Building Interaction, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark

2. Institute of Building Physics, Services and Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering Sciences, TU Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria

3. Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Bute Building, King Edward VII Ave., Cardiff CF10 3NB, UK

4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

5. Laboratory of Integrated Comfort Engineering (ICE), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

6. Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06125 Perugia, Italy

7. Environmental Applied Physics Lab (EAPLAB.net) at CIRIAF Interuniversity Research Centre, University of Perugia, 06125 Perugia, Italy

8. School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia

9. School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

10. Laboratory of Engineering Sciences for the Environment LaSIE (UMR CNRS 7356), La Rochelle University, 17000 La Rochelle, France

Abstract

Professionals in the building design and operation fields typically look at standards and guidelines as a reliable source of information and guidance with regard to procedural, contractual, and legal scope and requirements that are relevant to accountability issues and compliance necessities. Specifically, indoor environmental quality (IEQ) standards support professionals to bring about comfortable thermal, air quality, acoustic, or visual conditions in buildings. In this context, it appears essential to regularly examine the IEQ standards’ applicability and scientific validity. The present contribution focuses on common thermal comfort standards in view of the reasoning and includes evidence behind their recommendations and requirements. Thereby, several international and national thermal comfort standards are examined via a structured matrix to assess basic parameters, design and performance variables targeted by the standards, suggested value ranges, and both general and specific evidence from the scientific literature. Finally, this paper discusses findings and points to the identified gaps in the chain of evidence from the results of scientific studies and the recommendations included in the thermal standards. As such, the present contribution has the potential to inform future developments regarding transparent and evidence-based thermal standards.

Funder

Austrian Science Fund

Italian Ministry of University and Research

European Commission Horizon Europe programme

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction

Reference86 articles.

1. Nriagu, J. (2019). Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].

2. Review of Multi-domain Approaches to Indoor Environmental Perception and Behaviour;Schweiker;Build. Environ.,2020

3. How Subjective and Non-Physical Parameters Affect Occupants’ Environmental Comfort Perception;Castaldo;Energy Build.,2018

4. Perceived Control in Indoor Environments: A Conceptual Approach;Hellwig;Build. Res. Inf.,2015

5. Hellwig, R.T., Brasche, S., and Bischof, W. (2006, January 27–30). Thermal Comfort in Offices—Natural Ventilation vs. Air-Conditioning. Proceedings of the Windsor Conference, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3