The Evolution of Open Space Planning within a Developing, Biodiverse City (Durban, South Africa)
-
Published:2024-04-07
Issue:7
Volume:16
Page:3073
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
McLean Cameron T.12, Roberts Debra C.134ORCID, Slotow Rob56ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pvt Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa 2. Biodiversity Management Department, eThekwini Municipality, Durban 4001, South Africa 3. Sustainable and Resilient City Initiatives Unit, eThekwini Municipality, Durban 4001, South Africa 4. Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7500 Enschede, The Netherlands 5. Centre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pvt Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa 6. Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Abstract
Conserving and restoring biodiversity is central to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. The need to curb biodiversity loss through the mainstreaming of biodiversity considerations within land-use planning is consistently highlighted in global biodiversity assessments intended for policymakers and practitioners. We present a Global South local government-led examination of the mainstreaming of biodiversity issues within a biodiversity hotspot area. Here, we evaluated the four-decade-long evolution in open space planning in Durban, South Africa, in response to shifting urbanisation, governance and policy/legislative contexts. We assessed the role of science in responding to contextual changes, the need for champions, and key institutional interventions undertaken to embed a biodiversity function within local government. In addition, we investigated how biodiversity concerns have been incorporated into land-use planning applications via the city’s environmental planning function. We provide evidence of the advancement of mainstreaming biodiversity concerns within local government processes, institutional functions, and land-use decision-making. This has been achieved through effective and sustained leadership; the use of science and scientific information in advancing the policy and legislative environment and building political support by responding to shifting governance contexts; investment in institutional scientific capacity and generating scale-appropriate biodiversity information. Learnings from this paper may be useful for other local governments addressing biodiversity loss through land-use planning processes, by identifying critical investment areas that may shorten the time required for effective mainstreaming.
Reference103 articles.
1. The Sprawling Planet: Simplifying the Measurement of Global Urbanization Trends;Gerten;Front. Environ. Sci.,2019 2. Khor, N., Arimah, B., Otieno, R.O., van Oostrum, M., Mutinda, M., and Martins, J.O. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities, UN-Habitat. 3. UNGA (2023, April 02). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n15/291/89/pdf/n1529189.pdf?token=kfO1RZ4wyJcbeRUD9G&fe=true. 4. Scenarios for Adaptation and Mitigation in Urban Africa under 1.5 °C Global Warming;Lwasa;Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.,2018 5. Diaz, S., Settele, J., Brondizio, E., Ngo, H.T., Gueze, M., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K., and Butchart, S. (2019). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES Secretariat.
|
|