Spatial Distribution of Hunting and Its Potential Effect on Browsing Impact of Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) on Forest Vegetation

Author:

Griesberger Paul1ORCID,Kunz Florian1,Reimoser Friedrich12ORCID,Hackländer Klaus13ORCID,Obermair Leopold4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria

2. Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Savoyenstraße 1, 1160 Vienna, Austria

3. Deutsche Wildtier Stiftung (German Wildlife Foundation), Christoph-Probst-Weg 4, 20251 Hamburg, Germany

4. Lower Austrian Hunting Organisation, Wickenburggasse 3, 1080 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Increasing numbers of wild ungulates in human-dominated landscapes in Europe could lead to negative effects, such as damages to forests through browsing. To prevent those effects and, thus, mitigate wildlife-based conflicts while ensuring viable ungulate populations, sustainable management is required. Roe deer, as the most abundant cervid species in Europe, is primarily managed via hunting to decrease population densities through harvesting. Besides direct mortality, non-lethal effects of hunting activities further affect the spatial habitat selection for this species. Accordingly, the spatial distribution of hunting locations might influence game impact on forest vegetation. To examine these relationships in more detail, we linked the spatial distribution of hunting locations for roe deer with forest damage through browsing in 20 regions in Upper Austria. Consistent with our hypothesis, an avoidance of forests by hunters was found in regions with <20% forest cover and intolerable browsing impact. When hunters in certain regions, however, used forests according to their availability, game impact on forest vegetation was tolerable. Although forest damage by ungulates depends on numerous factors, we conclude that careful consideration of hunting locations might be an additional approach to reduce browsing intensity by roe deer, at least in regions with low forest cover.

Funder

Office of the Upper Austrian Provincial Government, the Upper Austrian Hunting Organisation, and the Upper Austrian Chamber of Agriculture

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecological Modeling,Ecology

Reference53 articles.

1. Hunting for fear: Innovating management of human-wildlife conflicts;Cromsigt;J. Appl. Ecol.,2013

2. Hackländer, K., and Zachos, F.E. (2022). Handbook of the Mammals of Europe, Springer.

3. Thirty-four polymorphic microsatellites for European roe deer;Vial;Mol. Ecol. Notes,2003

4. Are European Roe Deer browsers? A review of variations in the composition of their diets;Tixier;Rev. D’écologie,1996

5. Habitat use under predation risk: Hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer;Bonnot;Eur. J. Wildl. Res.,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3