Quadratic American Strangle Options in Light of Two-Sided Optimal Stopping Problems

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine some American-style financial instruments that lead to two-sided optimal hitting problems. We pay particular attention to derivatives that are similar to strangle options but have a quadratic payoff function. We consider these derivatives in light of much more general payoff structures under certain conditions which guarantee that the optimal strategy is an exit from a strip. Closed-form formulas for the optimal boundaries and the fair price are derived when the contract has no maturity constraints. We obtain the form of the optimal boundaries under the finite maturity horizon and approximate them by maximizing the financial utility of the derivative holder. The Crank–Nicolson finite difference method is applied to the pricing problem. The importance of these novel financial instruments is supported by several features that are very useful for financial practice. They combine the characteristics of the power options and the ordinary American straddles. Quadratic strangles are suitable for investors who need to hedge strongly, far from the strike positions. In contrast, the near-the-money positions offer a relatively lower payoff than the ordinary straddles. Note that the usual options pay exactly the overprice; no more, no less. In addition, the quadratic strangles allow investors to hedge the positions below and above the strike together. This is very useful in periods of high volatility when large market movements are expected but their direction is unknown.