Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Palackého tř. 1946/1, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic
2. Department of Plant Origin Food Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic
Abstract
The study aims to assess the impact of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the oxidation status of five types of analogue meat products, crucial for extending shelf life and maintaining quality, and seeks to optimize packaging strategies to mitigate oxidation and provide possible solutions for enhancing the overall quality of analogue meat products. Gas ratios in MAP, as well as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), free fatty acids (FFA), total polyphenol content, and antioxidant capacity were assessed through four different assays (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl: DPPH, Azino-Bis (3-Ethylbenzothiazoline-6-Sulfonic Acid): ABTS, Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power: FRAP, Cupric reducing antioxidant capacity: CUPRAC) for analogue meat products (steak, noodles, filet, burger, and mince) on the last day of their shelf life. O2 ratios in the MAP for all the products did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), but CO2 concentrations significantly differed (p > 0.05) in the MAP of the evaluated products. The minced product exhibited higher oxidative stability with the lowest TBARS (3.20 mg MDA·kg−1) and FFA (1.12% total fat as oleic acid), along with a high antioxidant capacity (DPPH: 32.26, ABTS: 4.49% inhibition, CUPRAC: 11.48 Trolox mmol/kg). The filet product was more susceptible to the oxidation process, as evidenced by the significantly (p > 0.05) higher TBARS value (9.71 mg MDA·kg−1), lower polyphenol content (1.01 mg gallic acid/g), and antioxidant capacity (FRAP: 4.75 mmol/g, CPRAC: 5.57 Trolox mmol/kg).
Funder
University of Veterinary Sciences Brno
Reference44 articles.
1. Structuring processes for meat analogues;Dekkers;Trends Food Sci. Technol.,2018
2. Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers;Collier;Appetite,2021
3. Plant protein-based alternatives of reconstructed meat: Science, technology, and challenges;Sha;Trends Food Sci. Technol.,2020
4. Meat analogues: Health promising sustainable meat substitutes;Kumar;Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.,2017
5. Kyriakopoulou, K., Keppler, J.K., and van der Goot, A.J. (2021). Functionality of ingredients and additives in plant-based meat analogues. Foods, 10.