Affiliation:
1. Lumir Lab, Asana Bio Group Ltd., The Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University Biotechnology Park, Ein Kerem Campus, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
Abstract
Terpenes and terpenoids content in cannabis plant was already studied in the past with three used methods. Since these works did not compare the content of these substances under the same conditions, we tried to make this comparison exactly. Three different gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GS/MS) methods—hexane-based liquid extraction (Lis), static headspace extraction (HS), and headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME)—were compared to identify volatile compounds in four different cannabis chemotypes—Green fields chemotype, Titan chemotype, Black Domina chemotype, and Neptune chemotype. The main compounds focused on were monoterpenes/monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenes/sesquiterpenoids. For a final evaluation of the comparison of the three methods of analysis, hexane extraction gives comparable results (which is advantageous for quantitative analysis), although the other two methods allowed the identification of more substances. This means that the same method should be used everywhere for the quantitative evaluation of constituents in cannabis.
Reference61 articles.
1. Booth, J.K., Page, J.E., and Bohlmann, J. (2017). Terpene synthases from Cannabis sativa. PLoS ONE, 12.
2. Booth, J. (2020). Terpene and Isoprenoid Biosynthesis in Cannabis sativa. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of British Columbia].
3. Terpenes in Cannabis sativa—From plant genome to humans;Booth;Plant Sci.,2019
4. Methylerythritol Phosphate Pathway of Isoprenoid Biosynthesis;Zhao;Ann. Rev. Biochem.,2013
5. The plants’ 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway for biosynthesis of isoprenoids;Lichtenthaler;Fett/Lipid,1998