Determining the Safety Level of State Roads: An Italian Case Study

Author:

Pernetti Mariano1ORCID,Antoniazzi Arianna2ORCID,Ketabdari Misagh2ORCID,Crispino Maurizio2ORCID,Toraldo Emanuele2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Engineering, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy

Abstract

This study aims to establish an effective approach for evaluating the safety performance of road infrastructure. Road safety levels are typically quantified using safety performance indicators. However, due to the stochastic nature of accidents, many safety performance indicators cannot adequately and completely describe reality. Therefore, predictive methods based on regression models are widely used. This approach also allows for the identification of latent risk conditions in the infrastructure, even in the absence of accidents. Among available approaches, the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology is chosen for its synthesis of validated highway research and best practices for incorporating safety into both new design and rehabilitation. For this study, a preliminary new version of HSM is used. The application of this method, which combines a predictive model with observed accidents through an empirical Bayesian approach, requires a calibration process that is crucial to tailoring this method to the specific study context. In this research, the predictive model is calibrated for single carriageway roads with one lane per direction across the Italian national network. Following calibration, the safety indicators are evaluated. The results obtained according to different indicators are compared to show the importance of adopting this method to counteract the regression to the mean of observed crashes. In fact, the method, supported by empirical Bayesian analysis, enables the identification of high-risk sections of the road network, selecting more sections that would be neglected by traditional indicators based solely on observed crashes. Finally, a possible approach to prioritizing sites for inspection based both on the excess of crashes and the Safety Potential (SAPO) is proposed. In addition, SAPO is adjusted to local conditions to account for the specific context and the decreasing trend of accidents over the years.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference62 articles.

1. WHO—World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018, WHO.

2. European Commission—Mobility and Transport (2020). EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021–2030 Next Steps Towards ‘Vision Zero’, European Commission.

3. MIMS—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e della Mobilità Sostenibili (2021). Piano Nazionale Sicurezza Stradale 2030 Indirizzi Generali e Linee Guida di Attuazione, MIMS.

4. Istat—Istituto Nazione di Statistica, and ACI—Automobile Club d’Italia (2023). Incidenti Stradali—Anno 2022, Ufficio stampa ACI, Ufficio stampa ISTAT.

5. MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2012). Linee Guida Per La Gestione Della Sicurezza Delle Infrastrutture Stradali—D.Lgs n.35/11, MIT.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3