Effects of Multimodal Physical and Cognitive Fitness Training on Sustaining Mental Health and Job Readiness in a Military Cohort
-
Published:2023-06-02
Issue:11
Volume:15
Page:9016
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Taylor Paul1ORCID, Walker Frederick Rohan23, Heathcote Andrew1, Aidman Eugene34
Affiliation:
1. School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia 2. Centre for Advanced Training Systems, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia 3. School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia 4. Division of Human and Decision Sciences, Defence Science & Technology Group, Edinburgh, SA 5111, Australia
Abstract
Drawing on the emerging area of workplace sustainability, this study sought to measure the effects of multimodal physical and cognitive fitness training on sustaining mental health and job readiness via impacts on subjective burnout, mental wellbeing, and resilience in a military cohort. Volunteer participants were block randomised into either a standard 4-week resilient mind program (RMP) intervention or an RMP combined with self-paced functional imagery practice (RMP+FI). Self-reported burnout, mental wellbeing, and resilience were measured at baseline and at the end of the 4-week intervention using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and the World Health Organization’s WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5), respectively. A total of 78 participants were enrolled in the study and 72 (92%) completed the program. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed significant effects of the RMP intervention, with both the RMP and RMP+FI groups reporting improved resilience (F(1, 70) = 13.08, p < 0.001, partial ω2 = 0.00086) and mental wellbeing (F(1, 70) = 41.86, p < 0.001, partial ω2 = 0.36). Both groups also reported improved burnout markers for professional efficacy (F(1, 70) = 6.25, p < 0.002, partial ω2 = 0.02), as well as reduced emotional exhaustion (F(1, 70) = 31.84, p < 0.001, partial ω2 = 0.02) and job cynicism (F(1, 70) = 8.80, p < 0.005, partial ω2 = 0.005). The FI practice produced no significant improvement in the RMP-only condition. Our results support the efficacy of RMP intervention in reducing burnout symptoms and improving self-reported mental wellbeing and resilience in a cohort of serving Navy aviators.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference37 articles.
1. Understanding the Burnout Experience: Recent Research and Its Implications for Psychiatry;Maslach;World Psychiatry,2016 2. Job Burnout and Cognitive Functioning: A Systematic Review;Deligkarisa;Work Stress Int. J. Work Health Organ.,2014 3. The Impact of Burnout on Human Physiology and on Operational Performance: A Prospective Study of Soldiers Enrolled in the Combat Diver Qualification Course;Morgan;Yale J. Biol. Med.,2002 4. López-Núñez, M.I., Rubio-Valdehita, S., Diaz-Ramiro, E.M., and Aparicio-García, M.E. (2020). Psychological Capital, Workload, and Burnout: What’s New? The Impact of Personal Accomplishment to Promote Sustainable Working Conditions. Sustainability, 12. 5. Burnout–Depression Overlap: A Review;Bianchi;Clin. Psychol. Rev.,2015
|
|