Teaching Methods in Medical Education: An Analysis of the Assessments and Preferences of Students

Author:

Fernández-Rodríguez Conrado A.1,Arenas-Fenollar M. Carmen2ORCID,Lacruz-Pérez Irene3ORCID,Tárraga-Mínguez Raúl3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain

2. Department of Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain

3. Department of Education and School Management, Faculty of Teacher Training, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Abstract

Knowing which teaching methods students value the most is important, as it directly affects the quality of learning. This paper analyzes which teaching methods are most commonly used in the Medicine Degree at a Spanish university, as perceived by both professors and students. It further explores the students’ assessments of these methods and the relationship between these assessments and the methods’ frequencies of use. The participants were 36 professors and 150 students. Professors completed the Teaching and Assessment Methodology of University Faculty Questionnaire (TAMUFQ), while students were administered a specially designed questionnaire. The questionnaire defined twelve teaching methods, and students were asked to provide their personal assessment and the frequency of use for each method based on their experiences. Professors reported adhering to a traditional style of teaching and assessment. According to the students, the most commonly used method was the lecture, although their assessments of lectures were significantly lower than the frequency with which that method was being used. Regarding the eleven remaining methods, the prospective doctors’ assessments were significantly higher than the methods’ degree of use. The main conclusion is that, while students did not negatively assess lectures, they considered them to be overused. This may mean that the potential of other teaching methods is being missed.

Funder

University of Valencia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference41 articles.

1. United Nations (2023, March 27). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement.

2. Is medical education ready for generation Z?;Lick;J. Grad. Med. Educ.,2018

3. To the point: Reviews in medical education teaching techniques;Krueger;Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,2004

4. Hew, K.F., and Lo, C.K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Med. Educ., 18.

5. Is lecture dead? A preliminary study of medical students’ evaluation of teaching methods in the preclinical curriculum;Zinski;Int. J. Med. Educ.,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3