Evaluating the Effectiveness of Designs for Low-Cost Digital Manufacturing Systems

Author:

Kaiser Jan1ORCID,Hawkridge Gregory1ORCID,Mukherjee Anandarup1ORCID,McFarlane Duncan1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, 17 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK

Abstract

There are many well-known systematic approaches to design the digital systems used in manufacturing. However, there are only a few approaches that specifically deal with low-cost components. Such components may not provide the same level of completeness as more expensive industrial alternatives and may need to be combined with other components to become comparable. Consequently, common design challenges for systems comprising such low-cost components revolve around extendability and interface standardisation. There is a need for analysing the capability of the existing approaches to design these systems. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of designs for low-cost digital manufacturing systems that have been derived from a particular design approach. The proposed evaluation methodology is used for the special case of designs that are directly based on reference architectures and for the development of specific metrics for that purpose. To quantify the effectiveness, these metrics are applied to a number of design scenarios. Although focusing on reference-architecture-based designs, the proposed methodology can also be used for other design approaches. The evaluation and structured implementation comparison helps practitioners in selecting an effective design approach to low-cost digital manufacturing systems and provides insights into how a particular design approach can become more effective.

Funder

the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference57 articles.

1. Gregory, S.A. (1966). The Design Method, Springer US.

2. Farid, A.M., and Suh, N.P. (2016). Axiomatic Design in Large Systems, Springer International Publishing.

3. Moses, J. (, January October). Architecting Engineering Systems. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands.

4. Clements, P.C. (1996, January 22–23). A Survey of Architecture Description Languages. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Schloss Velen, Germany.

5. Object Oriented Programming;Rentsch;ACM SIGPLAN Not.,1982

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3