Affiliation:
1. Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
2. CAS Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou 510640, China
3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development, Guangzhou 510640, China
4. Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Research Center of Ronggui Street, Shunde District, Foshan 528000, China
Abstract
Rural decentralized domestic wastewater treatment (DDWT) facilities, as an alternative to centralized sewage treatment plants, have been rapidly developed in rural areas worldwide. However, the lack of performance evaluations and operational status assessments of these facilities poses a significant obstacle to advancements in rural domestic wastewater treatment strategies. In the present study, 30 rural DDWT facilities with AO (anoxic/oxic) and AAO (anaerobic/anoxic/oxic) processes were investigated. The results revealed that only two facilities reached the first A-grade discharge standards of China, and twelve facilities met the first B-grade discharge standards for all ten wastewater quality indicators. Low standard-achieving ratios for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) (63.3%), total nitrogen (TN) (60.0%), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) (63.3%), total phosphorus (TP) (30.0%), suspended solids (SS) (46.7%), and fecal coliforms (FC) (26.7%) were calculated. Thus, it is essential to improve the treatment efficiency for BOD5, TN, NH3-N, TP, SS, and FC for rural wastewater treatment facilities. In addition, the AAO process had a median weighted average removal efficiency of 82.02%, which was better than that of the AO process (72.48%). Minor equipment failure rates, i.e., less than 20%, did not affect the operation of the rural DDWT facilities, since most equipment in the DDWT facilities was backed up. Notably, problems in several areas, e.g., process design, equipment selection, construction, and especially operations, influencing treatment performance should be investigated and proactively addressed. These findings provide specific suggestions for improvements that could benefit the long-term operation and management of rural DDWT facilities.
Funder
Energy Bureau of Guangdong Province
Reference49 articles.
1. Yu, Q., Liu, R., Chen, J., and Chen, L. (2019). Electrical conductivity in rural domestic sewage: An indication for comprehensive concentrations of influent pollutants and the effectiveness of treatment facilities. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 143.
2. Assessment and improvement analysis of economic production, water pollution, and sewage treatment efficiency in China;Shi;Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci.,2021
3. Urban sewage treatment odor gas release characteristics and regional differences;Liu;Environ. Technol. Innov.,2021
4. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (2020). Bulletin on China’s Ecological Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China.
5. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (2020). Urban-Rural Construction Statistical Yearbook, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China.