Phylogenetic Relationships in the Group Caespitosa of Paspalum L. (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paspaleae)
-
Published:2023-01-18
Issue:2
Volume:15
Page:134
-
ISSN:1424-2818
-
Container-title:Diversity
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Diversity
Author:
Delfini Carolina1ORCID, Acosta Juan M.1, Aliscioni Sandra S.12, Souza Vinicius Castro3ORCID, Zuloaga Fernando O.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion (ANCEFN–CONICET), Labardén 200, Casilla de Correo 22, San Isidro B1642HYD, Argentina 2. Cátedra de Botánica General, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires C1417DSE, Argentina 3. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias 11, Piracicaba 13418–900, SP, Brazil
Abstract
The informal group Caespitosa of Paspalum L. comprises 13–15 perennial species that are able to tolerate extreme climatic stresses, such as prolonged droughts, floods, and saltwater. Previous molecular phylogenetic studies have suggested that the Caespitosa might not be monophyletic, but they did not analyze a large enough sample of taxa for a meaningful conclusion. In this study, we evaluate the phylogeny of the genus Paspalum using parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian inference based on four DNA regions (ETS, ndhF, rpl16, and trnH-psbA) and increasing the number of sampled species (i.e., a total of 13 taxa and 40 new accessions of the group Caespitosa). Our main objective was to analyze the positions of Caespitosa taxa, assuming a priori that they do not represent a natural group as traditionally circumscribed. Our findings showed the Caespitosa species distributed in seven morphologically distinct clades and correlated with members of the informal groups Alma, Corcovadensia, Dissecta, Lachnea, Macrophylla, Notata, Paniculata, and Rupestria. Clades containing Caespitosa taxa were characterized based on morphological, anatomical, and cytological evidence, one of which was associated with geographic isolation. A comparison with results from other studies, a brief discussion on the group Macrophylla, which our analyses showed to be polyphyletic, and comments on the need for future molecular studies in Paspalum are also included.
Funder
Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecological Modeling,Ecology
Reference89 articles.
1. Revisión de las especies de Paspalum para América del Sur Austral (Argentina, Bolivia, sur de Brasil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay);Zuloaga;Monogr. Syst. Bot. Mo. Bot. Gard.,2005 2. Hudges, H.D., Heath, M.E., and Metcalfe, D.S. (1962). Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture, The Iowa State University Press. 3. Gramíneas forrageiras nativas do Distrito Federal, Brasil;Filguerias;Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras.,1992 4. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Paspalum (Poaceae) based on cpDNA and morphology;Rua;Plant Syst. Evol.,2010 5. BFG (The Brazil Flora Group) (2021). Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon, 71, 178–198.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|