Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
2. Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80809 Munich, Germany
Abstract
Introduction: The measurement of physical frailty in elderly patients with orthopedic impairments remains a challenge due to its subjectivity, unreliability, time-consuming nature, and limited applicability to uninjured individuals. Our study aims to address this gap by developing objective, multifactorial machine models that do not rely on mobility data and subsequently validating their predictive capacity concerning the Timed-up-and-Go test (TUG test) in orthogeriatric patients. Methods: We utilized 67 multifactorial non-mobility parameters in a pre-processing phase, employing six feature selection algorithms. Subsequently, these parameters were used to train four distinct machine learning algorithms, including a generalized linear model, a support vector machine, a random forest algorithm, and an extreme gradient boost algorithm. The primary goal was to predict the time required for the TUG test without relying on mobility data. Results: The random forest algorithm yielded the most accurate estimations of the TUG test time. The best-performing algorithm demonstrated a mean absolute error of 2.7 s, while the worst-performing algorithm exhibited an error of 7.8 s. The methodology used for variable selection appeared to exert minimal influence on the overall performance. It is essential to highlight that all the employed algorithms tended to overestimate the time for quick patients and underestimate it for slower patients. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of predicting the TUG test time using a machine learning model that does not depend on mobility data. This establishes a basis for identifying patients at risk automatically and objectively assessing the physical capacity of currently immobilized patients. Such advancements could significantly contribute to enhancing patient care and treatment planning in orthogeriatric settings.
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Aging,Health (social science)
Reference52 articles.
1. CDC (2023, July 28). STEADI Assessment Timed Up & Go (TUG), Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/pdf/TUG_Test-print.pdf.
2. Martin, P., Keppler, A.M., Alberton, P., Neuerburg, C., Drey, M., Böcker, W., Kammerlander, C., and Saller, M.M. (2021). Self-Assessment of Mobility of People over 65 Years of Age. Medicina, 57.
3. Clinical Judgment versus Geriatric Assessment for Frailty in Older Patients with Cancer;Scheepers;J. Geriatr. Oncol.,2020
4. Assessment of Muscle Function and Physical Performance in Daily Clinical Practice: A Position Paper Endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO);Beaudart;Calcif. Tissue Int.,2019
5. Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index;Mahoney;MD State Med. J.,1965
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献