Informed Decision-Making with and for People with Dementia—Efficacy of the PRODECIDE Education Program for Legal Representatives: A Randomized Controlled Trial (PRODECIDE-RCT) and Process Evaluation

Author:

Lühnen Julia12ORCID,Haastert Burkhard3ORCID,Richter Tanja1

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Natural Sciences, Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, 20146 Hamburg, Germany

2. Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Nursing Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany

3. mediStatistica, Zur Waldesruh 25, 42329 Wuppertal, Germany

Abstract

Legal representatives take a major role in healthcare decisions with and for people with dementia, but only a minority has a qualification in this field. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the PRODECIDE education program for legal representatives. In a prospective randomized controlled trial, legal representatives (volunteers and professionals, representing at least one person with dementia) were allocated (1:1 computer-generated block randomization) to the intervention (PRODECIDE education program) and control (standard care) groups. The primary outcome measure was knowledge, operationalized as the understanding of decision-making processes and in setting realistic expectations. Only data entry and analyses were blinded. A process evaluation in a mixed methods design was performed. We enrolled 218 legal representatives, and 216 were included in the primary analysis (intervention n = 109, control n = 107). The percentage of correct answers in the knowledge test post intervention was 69.0% in the intervention and 43.4% in the control group (difference 25.6%; CI 95%, 21.3 to 29.8; p < 0.001). In the comparison of professional and voluntary representatives, professionals had 13.6% (CI 95%, 8.0 to 19.2; p < 0.001) more correct answers. The PRODECIDE education program can improve the knowledge of legal representatives, an important prerequisite for evidence-based, informed decision-making.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) awarded

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference47 articles.

1. Deinert, H. (2022, October 22). Betreuungszahlen 2015. Statistics on Legal Representatives 2015. Official Survey by the German Federal Minstry of Justice, The Federal States’ Ministries of Social Affairs, Public Authorities Related to Legal Representation, The Federal Council of Notaries as well as the Federal Statistical Office. Available online: https://www.betreuer-weiterbildung.de/popup/pdf/Stat15.pdf.

2. 4th World Congress on Adult Guardianship (2022, October 22). Glossary. Available online: http://www.wcag2016.de/fileadmin/Mediendatenbank_WCAG/Tagungsmaterialien/Glossar.pdf.

3. Federal Minstry of Justice (2022, October 22). German Civil Code. Title 2, Sections 1896–1908, Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#p6447.

4. Köller, R., and Engels, D. (2009). Evaluation of the Second Legislative Amendment, Bundesanzeiger Verlag.

5. Clinical Trajectories of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Mild-Moderate to Advanced Dementia;Osorio;J. Alzheimer’s Dis.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3