Low Intra-Abdominal Pressure with Complete Neuromuscular Blockage Reduces Post-Operative Complications in Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery: A before–after Study

Author:

Brusasco Claudia,Germinale Federico,Dotta Federico,Benelli Andrea,Guano GiovanniORCID,Campodonico Fabio,Ennas Marco,Di Domenico Antonia,Santori Gregorio,Introini Carlo,Corradi Francesco

Abstract

Most urological interventions are now performed with minimally invasive surgery techniques such as laparoscopic surgery. Combining ERAS protocols with minimally invasive surgery techniques may be the best option to reduce hospital length-of-stay and post-operative complications. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that using low intra-abdominal pressures (IAP) during laparoscopy may reduce post-operative complications, especially those related to reduced intra-operative splanchnic perfusion or increased splanchnic congestion. We applied a complete neuromuscular blockade (NMB) to maintain an optimal space and surgical view. We compared 115 patients treated with standard IAP and moderate NMB with 148 patients treated with low IAP and complete NMB undergoing major urologic surgery. Low IAP in combination with complete NMB was associated with fewer total post-operative complications than standard IAP with moderate NMB (22.3% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.001), with a reduction in all medical post-operative complications (17 vs. 34, p < 0.001). The post-operative complications mostly reduced were acute kidney injury (15.5% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.004), anemia (6.8% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.049) and reoperation (2% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.035). The intra-operative management of laparoscopic interventions for major urologic surgeries with low IAP and complete NMB is feasible without hindering surgical conditions and might reduce most medical post-operative complications.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. (2022, October 03). Comparison of Retropubic, Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is the Winner?—PubMed, Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29362896/.

2. Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in 607 Patients with Bladder Cancer: Comparative Survival Analysis;Huang;Int. J. Urol. Off. J. Jpn. Urol. Assoc.,2021

3. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy versus Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: 24-Month Outcomes from a Randomised Controlled Study;Coughlin;Lancet Oncol.,2018

4. Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-Up;Lantz;Eur. Urol.,2021

5. Current Application of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Lessons Learned from European Excellence Centers;Albisinni;World J. Urol.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3