Towards Eradication of PPR: Disease Status, Economic Cost and Perception of Veterinarians in Karnataka, India
Author:
Govindaraj Gurrappa Naidu1ORCID, Balamurugan Vinayagamurthy1, Reddy Gundalahalli Bayyappa Manjunatha1ORCID, Yogisharadhya Revanaiah1ORCID, Reddy Timmareddy Sreenivasa2, Naveenkumar Gajalavarahalli Subbanna1, Kumar Kirubakaran Vinod1ORCID, Chaithra Hosahalli Rajanna1, Bi Afrin Zainab1, Parida Satya3ORCID, Njeumi Felix3, Roy Parimal1, Shome Bibek Ranjan1
Affiliation:
1. ICAR, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics (NIVEDI), Ramagondanahalli, Yelahanka, Bengaluru 560064, India 2. Animal Disease Surveillance Scheme, Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Government of Karnataka, Bengaluru 560024, India 3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
Abstract
In this study, we assessed the PPR disease status, its economic cost, the financial viability of vaccination, and the perspectives of field veterinarians on the PPR vaccination programme implemented in Karnataka state, India. In addition to secondary data, cross-sectional surveys undertaken during 2016–17 (survey I) and 2018–19 (survey II) from 673 sheep and goat flocks and data collected from 62 veterinarians were analysed. The economic costs and perceptions of veterinarians were analysed using deterministic models and the Likert scale, respectively, and the financial viability of vaccination programmes under the best (15%), base (20%), and worst-case (25%) PPR incidence scenarios, considering two different vaccination plans (plan I and plan II), was assessed. The disease incidence in sheep and goats was found to be 9.8% and 4.8% in survey I and survey II, respectively. In consonance with the increased vaccination coverage, the number of reported PPR outbreaks in the state declined significantly. The estimated farm-level loss of PPR varied between the surveyed years. Even under the best-incidence scenario, under vaccination plan-I and plan-II, the estimated benefit–cost ratio (18.4:1; 19.7:1), the net present value (USD 932 million; USD 936 million) and the internal rate of return (412%) implied that the vaccination programmes were financially viable and the benefits outweighed the cost. Though the majority of veterinarians perceived that the control programme was well planned and rolled out in the state, a few of them disagreed or were neutral towards the plan per se, towards the coordination between functionaries, the availability of funding, and the programme acceptance by farmers. Despite many years of vaccination, PPR still persists in the Karnataka state for various reasons and in order to eradicate the disease, a review of the existing control programme with strong facilitation from the federal government is needed.
Funder
The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Agricultural Extension Division Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying (DAHD), Government of India
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference30 articles.
1. Prevalence and distribution of Peste des petits ruminants virus infection in small ruminants in India;Singh;Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz.,2004 2. Balamurugan, V., Vinod Kumar, K., Dheeraj, R., Kurli, R., Suresh, K.P., Govindaraj, G., Shome, B.R., and Roy, P. (2021). Temporal and Spatial Epidemiological Analysis of Peste des Petits Ruminants Outbreaks from the Past 25 Years in Sheep and Goats and Its Control in India. Viruses, 13. 3. A short note on Peste des petits ruminants in Karnataka;Hegde;Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz.,2009 4. OIE, and FAO (2022, November 25). Manual on Global Strategy for the Control and Eradication of Pesti des Petits Ruminants. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4460e.pdf. 5. Peste des petits ruminants in India;Shaila;Vet. Rec.,1989
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|