Abstract
Additive Manufacturing, AM, is considered to be environmentally friendly when compared to conventional manufacturing processes. Most researchers focus on resource consumption when performing the corresponding Life Cycle Analysis, LCA, of AM. To that end, the sustainability of AM is compared to processes like milling. Nevertheless, factors such as resource use, pollution, and the effects of AM on human health and society should be also taken into account before determining its environmental impact. In addition, in powder-based AM, handling the powder becomes an issue to be addressed, considering both the operator´s health and the subsequent management of the powder used. In view of these requirements, the fundamentals of the different powder-based AM processes were studied and special attention paid to the health risks derived from the high concentrations of certain chemical compounds existing in the typically employed materials. A review of previous work related to the environmental impact of AM is presented, highlighting the gaps found and the areas where deeper research is required. Finally, the implications of the reuse of metallic powder and the procedures to be followed for the disposal of waste are studied.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Subject
General Materials Science,Metals and Alloys
Reference139 articles.
1. Wholers Report 2018: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry,2018
2. Adding It up: The Economic Impact of Additive Manufacturing;Süss,2018
3. The Disruptive Nature of 3D Printing;Bonneau,2017
4. Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations
5. Getting Past the Hype About 3-D Printing, Although Additive Manufacturing Techniques Hold Great Promise, Near-Term Expectations for Them Are Overoptimistic;Roca,2017
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献