Laryngopharyngeal Mucosal Injury Due to Nasogastric Tube Insertion during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Miyamoto Kazuyuki12ORCID,Takayasu Hiromi12,Katsuki Shino12,Maeda Atsuo12,Suzuki Keisuke1ORCID,Nakamura Motoyasu1,Hida Noriko3ORCID,Sambe Takehiko4,Yagi Masaharu1ORCID,Sasaki Jun1,Hayashi Munetaka12,Dohi Kenji1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency, Critical care and Disaster Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa University, Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 1428666, Japan

2. Department of Emergency, Critical care and Disaster Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Fujigaoka Aoba-ku, Yokohama City 2278501, Japan

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division of Clinical Research and Development, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Kita-karasuyama, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 1578577, Japan

4. Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Showa University, Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 1428666, Japan

Abstract

Background: Patients under cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are at high risk of aspirating gastric contents. Nasogastric tube insertion (NGTI) after tracheal intubation is usually performed blindly. This sometimes causes laryngopharyngeal mucosal injury (LPMI), leading to severe bleeding. This study clarified the incidence of LPMI due to blind NGTI during CPR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients presenting with cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival, categorized them into a Smooth group (Smooth; blind NGTI was possible within 2 min), and Difficult group (blind NGTI was not possible), and consequently performed video laryngoscope-assisted NGTI. The laryngopharyngeal mucosal condition was recorded using video laryngoscope. Success rates and insertion time for the Smooth group were calculated. Insertion number and LPMI scores were compared between the groups. Each regression line of outcome measurements was obtained using simple regression analysis. We also analyzed the causes of the Difficult group, using recorded video laryngoscope-assisted videos. Results: The success rate was 78.6% (66/84). NGTI time was 48.8 ± 4.0 s in the Smooth group. Insertion number and injury scores in the Smooth group were significantly lower than those in the Difficult group. The severity of LPMI increased with NGT insertion time and insertion number. Conclusions: Whenever blind NGTI is difficult, switching to other methods is essential to prevent unnecessary persistence.

Funder

JSPS KAKENHI

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3