Safety and Feasibility of Intraoperative High PEEP Titrated to the Lowest Driving Pressure (ΔP)—Interim Analysis of DESIGNATION

Author:

Nijbroek Sunny G. L. H.12,Hol Liselotte1ORCID,Serpa Neto Ary34,van Meenen David M. P.1ORCID,Hemmes Sabrine N. T.5,Hollmann Markus W.1ORCID,Schultz Marcus J.367ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands

3. Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia

5. Department of Anesthesiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

6. Mahidol–Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand

7. Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK

Abstract

Uncertainty remains about the best level of intraoperative positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP). An ongoing RCT (‘DESIGNATION’) compares an ‘individualized high PEEP’ strategy (‘iPEEP’)—titrated to the lowest driving pressure (ΔP) with recruitment maneuvers (RM), with a ‘standard low PEEP’ strategy (‘low PEEP’)—using 5 cm H2O without RMs with respect to the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. This report is an interim analysis of safety and feasibility. From September 2018 to July 2022, we enrolled 743 patients. Data of 698 patients were available for this analysis. Hypotension occurred more often in ‘iPEEP’ vs. ‘low PEEP’ (54.7 vs. 44.1%; RR, 1.24 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.44); p < 0.01). Investigators were compliant with the study protocol 285/344 patients (82.8%) in ‘iPEEP’, and 345/354 patients (97.5%) in ‘low PEEP’ (p < 0.01). Most frequent protocol violation was missing the final RM at the end of anesthesia before extubation; PEEP titration was performed in 99.4 vs. 0%; PEEP was set correctly in 89.8 vs. 98.9%. Compared to ‘low PEEP’, the ‘iPEEP’ group was ventilated with higher PEEP (10.0 (8.0–12.0) vs. 5.0 (5.0–5.0) cm H2O; p < 0.01). Thus, in patients undergoing general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery, an individualized high PEEP ventilation strategy is associated with hypotension. The protocol is feasible and results in clear contrast in PEEP. DESIGNATION is expected to finish in late 2023.

Funder

ZonMW

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3