RI2AP: Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction in Assembly Pipelines
Author:
Shyalika Chathurangi1ORCID, Roy Kaushik1ORCID, Prasad Renjith1ORCID, Kalach Fadi El2ORCID, Zi Yuxin1ORCID, Mittal Priya1, Narayanan Vignesh1, Harik Ramy2ORCID, Sheth Amit1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Artificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA 2. McNair Center for Aerospace Innovation and Research, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201, USA
Abstract
Predicting anomalies in manufacturing assembly lines is crucial for reducing time and labor costs and improving processes. For instance, in rocket assembly, premature part failures can lead to significant financial losses and labor inefficiencies. With the abundance of sensor data in the Industry 4.0 era, machine learning (ML) offers potential for early anomaly detection. However, current ML methods for anomaly prediction have limitations, with F1 measure scores of only 50% and 66% for prediction and detection, respectively. This is due to challenges like the rarity of anomalous events, scarcity of high-fidelity simulation data (actual data are expensive), and the complex relationships between anomalies not easily captured using traditional ML approaches. Specifically, these challenges relate to two dimensions of anomaly prediction: predicting when anomalies will occur and understanding the dependencies between them. This paper introduces a new method called Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction (RI2AP) designed to address both dimensions effectively. RI2AP is demonstrated on a rocket assembly simulation, showing up to a 30-point improvement in F1 measure compared to current ML methods. This highlights its potential to enhance automated anomaly prediction in manufacturing. Additionally, RI2AP includes a novel interpretation mechanism inspired by a causal-influence framework, providing domain experts with valuable insights into sensor readings and their impact on predictions. Finally, the RI2AP model was deployed in a real manufacturing setting for assembling rocket parts. Results and insights from this deployment demonstrate the promise of RI2AP for anomaly prediction in manufacturing assembly pipelines.
Reference54 articles.
1. Anumbe, N., Saidy, C., and Harik, R. (2022). A Primer on the Factories of the Future. Sensors, 22. 2. Data-driven smart manufacturing;Tao;J. Manuf. Syst.,2018 3. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies;Oztemel;J. Intell. Manuf.,2020 4. Morariu, C., and Borangiu, T. (2018, January 24–26). Time series forecasting for dynamic scheduling of manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 5. Apostolou, G., Ntemi, M., Paraschos, S., Gialampoukidis, I., Rizzi, A., Vrochidis, S., and Kompatsiaris, I. (2024). Novel Framework for Quality Control in Vibration Monitoring of CNC Machining. Sensors, 24.
|
|