Can Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) Be Used to Predict Pig’s Meat Quality In Vivo?
-
Published:2022-11-24
Issue:23
Volume:12
Page:12035
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Przybylski WiesławORCID, Jaworska Danuta, Sot Magdalena, Sieczko LeszekORCID, Niemyjski Stanisław, Dukaczewska Karina, Wojtasik-Kalinowska Iwona
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the possibility of application of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in order to estimate pork quality. The BIA measurements were tested on 18 living animals for the prediction of the meat quality. The absolute resultant electrical resistance (Rz) and reactance (Xc) of the body was measured with a set of disposable surface electrodes at the frequency of 50 kHz and the current intensity of 400 µA. The characteristics of meat quality, pH measured 1 h and 24 h after slaughter, meat color parameters represented in CIE L*a*b* system, glycolytic potential, intramuscular fat, and natural drip loss, were assessed on the samples of the Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle. The slaughter value of pigs was characterized on the basis of hot carcass weight (HCW) and percent of meat in carcass. The results showed a significant Pearson correlation between bioelectrical impedance parameter Rz and pH1 (r = 0.48*, p < 0.05). A significant Spearman correlation was showed between color b* value and the Rz/Xc/HCW ratio (r = −0.62*, p < 0.05) and Xc (r = −0.51*, p < 0.05), as well as between the Rz/Xc ratio with pH1 (r = 0.48*, p < 0.05). The multivariate statistical method (principal component analysis and cluster analysis) showed that bioimpedance measurements combined with meat quality traits make it possible to distinguish groups with different quality parameters. However, the relationships between them are complex and still require analysis.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Berri, C., Picard, B., Lebret, B., Andueza, D., Lefèvre, F., Le Bihan-Duval, E., Beauclercq, S., Chartrin, P., Vautier, A., and Legrand, I. (2019). Predicting the quality of meat: Myth or reality?. Foods, 8. 2. Gagaoua, M., Duffy, G., Alvarez, C., Burgess, C.M., Hamill, R., Crofton, E., Botinestean, C., Ferragina, A., Cafferky, J., and Mullen, A.M. (2022). Current research and emerging tools to improve fresh red meat quality. Ir. J. Agric. Food Res., 1–23. 3. Przybylski, W., and Hopkins, D. (2016). Meat Quality Genetic and Environmental Factors, Taylor & Francis Group. 4. Trends in meat science and technology: The future looks bright, but the journey will be long;Meat Sci.,2014 5. Prediction of meat quality traits in the abattoir using portable near-infrared spectrometers: Heritability of predicted traits and genetic correlations with laboratory-measured traits;J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.,2021
|
|