Abstract
Currently, the influence of numerical parameters on the prediction accuracy of the compressible external flow field characterized by a NACA0012 airfoil under hypersonic speed, especially the influence analyses of the trailing edge shape, the modeling methods, and the adopted data points on it are relatively sparse. In this paper, using three modeling approaches and two data point sources, six NACA0012 airfoils are designed including two types of trailing edge shapes. Unlike under the incompressible external flow field, the comparative analysis shows that though the optimal accuracy is obtained by the sharp trailing edge, the improper sharp trailing edge design could result in a greater error ratio than that of the blunt trailing edge. Similarly, the definition formula could provide the best performance, while in other cases, NACA4 is preferred and the selection between them depends on the adopted data point source. Furthermore, the increase in the number of the adopted two types of data points would lead to a decrease in prediction accuracy. According to the comparison among all the optimal total error ratios, the suggested configuration is the sharp trailing edge based on the definition formula adopting 200 points sourced from NACA4 + 16 m far-field distance + SA turbulence model + ROE flux type and the best result is 2.05%.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science