Using Public Landslide Inventories for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment at the Basin Scale: Application to the Torto River Basin (Central-Northern Sicily, Italy)
-
Published:2023-08-21
Issue:16
Volume:13
Page:9449
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Martinello Chiara1ORCID, Mercurio Claudio1ORCID, Cappadonia Chiara1ORCID, Bellomo Viviana1, Conte Andrea1, Mineo Giampiero1, Di Frisco Giulia1, Azzara Grazia1, Bufalini Margherita2ORCID, Materazzi Marco2ORCID, Rotigliano Edoardo1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy 2. School of Science and Technology, Geology Division, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
Abstract
In statistical landslide susceptibility evaluation, the quality of the model and its prediction image heavily depends on the quality of the landslide inventories used for calibration. However, regional-scale inventories made available by public territorial administrations are typically affected by an unknown grade of incompleteness and mapping inaccuracy. In this research, a procedure is proposed for verifying and solving such limits by applying a two-step susceptibility modeling procedure. In the Torto River basin (central-northern Sicily, Italy), using an available regional landslide inventory (267 slide and 78 flow cases), two SUFRA_1 models were first prepared and used to assign a landslide susceptibility level to each slope unit (SLU) in which the study area was partitioned. For each of the four susceptibility classes that were obtained, 30% of the mapping units were randomly selected and their stable/unstable status was checked by remote analysis. The new, increased inventories were finally used to recalibrate two SUFRA_2 models. The prediction skills of the SUFRA_1 and SUFRA_2 models were then compared by testing their accuracy in matching landslide distribution in a test sub-basin where a high-resolution systematic inventory had been prepared. According to the results, the strong limits of the SUFRA_1 models (sensitivity: 0.67 and 0.57 for slide and flow, respectively) were largely solved by the SUFRA_2 model (sensitivity: 1 for both slide and flow), suggesting the proposed procedure as a possibly suitable modeling strategy for regional susceptibility studies.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., and Reichenbach, P. (1995). Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards, Springer. 2. Crozier, M.J., and Glade, T. (2012). A Review of Scale Dependency in Landslide Hazard and Risk Analysis, Wiley. 3. Guidelines for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning;Fell;Eng. Geol.,2008 4. Brabb, E.E. (1984, January 16–21). Innovative Approaches to Landslide Hazard and Risk Mapping. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Landslides, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Correlation Does Not Imply Geomorphic Causation in Data-Driven Landslide Susceptibility Modelling–Benefits of Exploring Landslide Data Collection Effects;Steger;Sci. Total Environ.,2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|