Using Public Landslide Inventories for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment at the Basin Scale: Application to the Torto River Basin (Central-Northern Sicily, Italy)

Author:

Martinello Chiara1ORCID,Mercurio Claudio1ORCID,Cappadonia Chiara1ORCID,Bellomo Viviana1,Conte Andrea1,Mineo Giampiero1,Di Frisco Giulia1,Azzara Grazia1,Bufalini Margherita2ORCID,Materazzi Marco2ORCID,Rotigliano Edoardo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy

2. School of Science and Technology, Geology Division, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy

Abstract

In statistical landslide susceptibility evaluation, the quality of the model and its prediction image heavily depends on the quality of the landslide inventories used for calibration. However, regional-scale inventories made available by public territorial administrations are typically affected by an unknown grade of incompleteness and mapping inaccuracy. In this research, a procedure is proposed for verifying and solving such limits by applying a two-step susceptibility modeling procedure. In the Torto River basin (central-northern Sicily, Italy), using an available regional landslide inventory (267 slide and 78 flow cases), two SUFRA_1 models were first prepared and used to assign a landslide susceptibility level to each slope unit (SLU) in which the study area was partitioned. For each of the four susceptibility classes that were obtained, 30% of the mapping units were randomly selected and their stable/unstable status was checked by remote analysis. The new, increased inventories were finally used to recalibrate two SUFRA_2 models. The prediction skills of the SUFRA_1 and SUFRA_2 models were then compared by testing their accuracy in matching landslide distribution in a test sub-basin where a high-resolution systematic inventory had been prepared. According to the results, the strong limits of the SUFRA_1 models (sensitivity: 0.67 and 0.57 for slide and flow, respectively) were largely solved by the SUFRA_2 model (sensitivity: 1 for both slide and flow), suggesting the proposed procedure as a possibly suitable modeling strategy for regional susceptibility studies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference61 articles.

1. Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., and Reichenbach, P. (1995). Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards, Springer.

2. Crozier, M.J., and Glade, T. (2012). A Review of Scale Dependency in Landslide Hazard and Risk Analysis, Wiley.

3. Guidelines for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning;Fell;Eng. Geol.,2008

4. Brabb, E.E. (1984, January 16–21). Innovative Approaches to Landslide Hazard and Risk Mapping. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Landslides, Toronto, ON, Canada.

5. Correlation Does Not Imply Geomorphic Causation in Data-Driven Landslide Susceptibility Modelling–Benefits of Exploring Landslide Data Collection Effects;Steger;Sci. Total Environ.,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3