Meta-Analysis of Herbicide Non-Target Effects on Pest Natural Enemies

Author:

Zilnik Gabriel1ORCID,Bergeron Paul E.2,Chuang Angela3,Diepenbrock Lauren3,Hanel Aldo2,Middleton Eric4ORCID,Moretti Erica1,Schmidt-Jeffris Rebecca1

Affiliation:

1. Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Crop Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, USA

2. Department of Entomology, Washington State University, 166 FSHN 100 Dairy Road, Pullman, WA 99164, USA

3. Entomology and Nematology Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Rd., Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA

4. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, 9335 Hazard Way Suite 201, San Diego, CA 92123, USA

Abstract

A critical component of integrated pest management is minimizing disruption of biological control by reducing the use of pesticides with significant non-target effects on natural enemies. Insecticide non-target effects testing for natural enemies has become increasingly common, but research examining the non-target effects of herbicides on natural enemies is scarce, and recommendations regarding herbicide selectivity are non-existent. We used meta-analysis to summarize laboratory bioassays testing non-target effects of herbicides on arthropod natural enemies and identify patterns in taxon susceptibility and active ingredient toxicity. Data were extracted from 78 papers representing 801 total observations. Herbicides increased natural enemy mortality and decreased longevity, reproduction, and predation. Mesostigmatan mites and hemipterans were the most sensitive to herbicides, and spiders, neuropterans, and hymenopterans were the least sensitive. Mortality was higher in juvenile predators versus parasitoids but did not differ between adults; parasitoid juveniles are likely better protected within the host. In terms of acute mortality, metribuzin, glufosinate, and oxyfluorfen were the most harmful herbicides. Only nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, pendimethalin, phenmedipham, atrazine, and urea did not increase natural enemy mortality. The large effect size of glufosinate is particularly concerning, as it is the most likely replacement herbicide for glyphosate in many crops. Many active ingredients remain under-studied. Our analysis indicates that herbicides have a strong potential to disrupt biological control in cropping systems.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Insect Science

Reference131 articles.

1. Pesticide side-effects on arthropod natural enemies: A database summary;Theiling;Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.,1988

2. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods;Desneux;Annu. Rev. Entomol.,2007

3. Croft, B.A. (1990). Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

4. Pimentel, D. (1971). Ecological Effects of Pesticides on Non-Target Species, Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology.

5. The potential impacts of insecticides on the life-history traits of bees and the consequences for pollination;Brittain;Basic Appl. Ecol.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3