Affiliation:
1. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell‘Emilia-Romagnia (IZSLER), Via Bianchi 7/9, 25124 Brescia, Italy
2. Section of Legal Medicine and LTTA Centre, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
Abstract
In recent years, burial systems have covered increasingly higher costs due to the pollution caused by decomposition products. These products are understood as chemicals and microorganisms in the surrounding soil and groundwater and represent a topical issue. The purpose of this research was to ascertain the extent of decomposition when pig carcasses are buried in two different burial systems (“aerated” vs. “watertight”) and catalogue the arthropods associated with burials at different time-points of removal from niches (after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months). Thirteen taxa were collected in aerated niches, whereas five were collected in watertight niches. The initial access or exclusion of insect colonisers affected overall functional activity. Two Diptera species, Hydrotaea capensis and Megaselia scalaris, were the most abundant, supporting the hypothesis that insects can colonise carcasses in aerated burial systems. Furthermore, some species of bacteria have been documented as facilitators of the initial decomposition process of the carcass. Most bacterial colonies develop only in aerated niches. The trial showed that the first enzymatic–bacterial and insect actions helped promote the process of cadaveric decomposition and later skeletonisation, mainly when associated with aeration modes of the tomb/mound. The results obtained provide essential information on the process of human decomposition and taphonomy in cemeteries. Moreover, these data could benefit forensic science by adding information on insect colonisation and body modification in medico-legal investigations concerning the post-mortem interval in exhumed bodies and illegal burials.
Reference31 articles.
1. Autopsy, thanatopraxy, cemeteries and crematoria as hotspots of toxic organic contaminants in the funeral industry continuum;Gwenzi;Sci. Total. Environ.,2021
2. Burial grounds’ impact on groundwater and public health: An overview;Oliveira;Water Environ. J.,2013
3. Park, D.S., Foottit, R., Maw, E., and Hebert, P.D.N. (2011). Barcoding Bugs: DNA-Based Identification of the True Bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera). PLoS ONE, 6.
4. Environmental damage and public health threat caused by cemeteries: A proposal of ideal cemeteries for the growing urban sprawl;Neckel;Urbe Rev. Bras. Gest. Urbana,2017
5. Hazardous elements in the soil of urban cemeteries; constructive solutions aimed at sustainability;Neckel;Chemosphere,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献