Foraging of Honeybees from Different Ecological Areas Determined through Melissopalynological Analysis and DNA Metabarcoding
Author:
Daugaliyeva Saule1ORCID, Daugaliyeva Aida2ORCID, Amirova Katira1ORCID, Yelubayeva Akmeiir1, Kapar Abylay1, Abiti Aishat1, Partipilo Thomas3ORCID, Toktarov Nurlan4ORCID, Peletto Simone3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. LLP ‘Scientific Production Center of Microbiology and Virology’, Bogenbay Batyr St. 105, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan 2. LLP ‘Kazakh Research Institute for Livestock and Fodder Production’, St. Zhandosova 51, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan 3. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, 10154 Turin, Italy 4. LLP “East Kazakhstan Agricultural Experimental Station”, East Kazakhstan Region, Glubokovsky District, Village of Experimental Field 070512, Kazakhstan
Abstract
The environment significantly impacts the lives of bees and their feeding. This study aimed to investigate bee foraging using melissopalynological analysis and DNA metabarcoding in intensive farming, reserved, and urbanized areas. The highest alpha diversity was observed in the reserved and intensive farming areas. The urbanized area had less diversity. In the intensive farming area, Sinapis, Helianthus, and Fagopyrum predominated; in the reserved area, Melilotus, Helianthus, and Brassica predominated. In the urbanized area, garden plants, namely radish (Raphanus sativus) and cucumber (Cucumis hystrix), and agricultural plants, namely soybean (Glycine max) and melon (Cucumis melo), were often found. The most significant agreement was between the rbcL and the melissopalynological analysis. The ITS2 revealed equal matches with both rbcL and melissopalynology, but this marker missed or underestimated some genera. Trifolium pretense and Brassica nigra were identified simultaneously by the melissopalinology method and two genetic markers in DNA metabarcoding. The species Convolvulus arvensis, Melilotus officinalis, Echium vulgare, Brassica rapa, Helianthus divaricatus, and Onobrychis viciifolia were found in all ecological areas. Imperfect databases impose some limits in the identification of some taxa using metabarcoding. The further research and expansion of plant databases is needed. Studying the food preferences of bees in different environmental conditions and landscapes is necessary to develop measures to preserve their populations.
Funder
Science Committee of the Ministry of Science Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Reference46 articles.
1. Khalifa, A.M., Elshafiey, E.H., Shetaia, A.A., El-Wahed, A.A., Algethami, A.F., Musharraf, S.G., AlAjmi, M.F., Zhao, C., Masry, S.H.D., and Abdel-Daim, M.M. (2021). Overview of Bee Pollination and Its Economic Value for Crop Production. Insects, 12. 2. Belsky, J., and Joshi, N.K. (2020). Effects of Fungicide and Herbicide Chemical Exposure on Apis and Non-Apis Bees in Agricultural Landscape. Front. Environ. Sci., 8. 3. Evaluating the Impact of Commonly Used Pesticides on Honeybees (Apis mellifera) in North Gonder of Amhara Region, Ethiopia;Zewdie;J. Toxicol.,2023 4. Landaverde, R., Rodriguez, M.T., and Parrella, J.A. (2023). Honey Production and Climate Change: Beekeepers’ Perceptions, Farm Adaptation Strategies, and Information Needs. Insects, 14. 5. Native habitat mitigates feast–famine conditions faced by honey bees in an agricultural landscape;Dolezal;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2019
|
|