Abstract
Chemical control is the main method used to combat fall armyworm in maize crops. However, its indiscriminate use usually leads to a more complex scenario characterized by loss of its effectiveness due to the development of resistance of the insect pest, emergence of secondary pests, and reduction of the populations of natural enemies. For this reason, efforts to develop strategies for agroecological pest management such as Push–Pull are increasingly growing. In this context, the present study was carried out to evaluate field effectiveness of Push–Pull systems for S. frugiperda management in maize crops in Morelos, Mexico. In a randomized block experiment, the incidence and severity of S. frugiperda, the development and yield of maize were evaluated in nine Push–Pull systems and a maize monoculture. The Push–Pull systems presented incidence/severity values lower than those of the monoculture. Morphological development and maize yield in the latter were lower than those of most Push–Pull systems. Mombasa—D. ambrosioides, Mulato II—T. erecta, Mulato II—C. juncea, Tanzania—T. erecta and Tanzania—D. ambrosioides systems presented higher yields than those of monocultures.
Funder
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Reference45 articles.
1. Bases Científicas Para una Agricultura Sustentable;Altieri,1999
2. Field and Laboratory Investigations in Agroecology;Gliessman,2014
3. Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty
4. Haciendo Milpa: La Protección de las Semillas y de la Agricultura Campesina;Álvarez,2011
5. Back to the Origin: In Situ Studies Are Needed to Understand Selection during Crop Diversification
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献