Resolving Conservation Conflicts through Shared Vision, Collective Benefits and Relevant Values

Author:

van de Water Antoinette12ORCID,Doornwaard Suzan3,Sluiter Liesbeth2,Henley Michelle456ORCID,Sutherland Catherine7,Slotow Rob18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa

2. Bring the Elephant Home Foundation, 3132 VB Vlaardingen, The Netherlands

3. The Elephant Path, 3012 GR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

4. Applied Behavioural Ecology and Ecosystem Research Unit, Florida Campus, University of South Africa, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa

5. Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa

6. Elephants Alive, Hoedspruit 1380, South Africa

7. School of Built Environment and Development Studies, Howard College, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa

8. Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Abstract

The global challenges of biodiversity loss and persistent poverty and inequality, which interact and shape each other at the local scale, require new strategies to improve human well-being and conserve biodiversity. In South Africa, inclusive and transformative conservation approaches are gaining support, which is of particular importance given the challenging history of conservation during the colonial and apartheid eras. The Dinokeng Game Reserve was created to conserve biodiversity and combat poverty in adjacent communities. However, human–elephant conflict and community development challenges have led to unproductive conservation trade-offs. We developed a Theory of Change for Living in Harmony that can help policymakers, conservation organisations and local communities to find better solutions. To develop the Theory of Change, we assessed the visions and perspectives towards (elephant) conservation and socio-economic development among both people living inside (owners/direct beneficiaries) and outside (community/indirect beneficiaries) the reserve. The study revealed common ground among stakeholder groups in ranking elephant benefits, as well as a collective acknowledgement of the importance of moral values in conservation decision making. However, the benefits of living within or adjacent to an elephant reserve differed considerably across stakeholder groups. Accordingly, different but not mutually exclusive solutions were suggested, including investments in multi-level good governance, education and capacity building, active community engagement and development, reserve expansion, and promoting the reserve’s integrated conservation model. This Theory of Change aims to support common ground between stakeholders, with critical feedback loops that reduce barriers and enable conditions for coexistence. It promotes conservation strategies that are socially relevant and widely supported, can create mutually beneficial outcomes for elephants, biodiversity, and multiple stakeholders, and can be applied to other species or ecosystems in general, with specific elements being tailored to those circumstances.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecological Modeling,Ecology

Reference113 articles.

1. UN General Assembly Kunming Declaration (2021, January 12–13). Ecological Civilization: Building a Shared Future for All Life on Earth. Proceedings of the Declaration from the High-Level Segment of the UN Biodiversity Conference 2020 (Part 1), United Nations Biodiversity Conference, Kunming, China.

2. (2022, January 19). Convention on Biological Diversity COP15: Nations Adopt Four Goals, 23 Targets for 2030. Proceedings of the Landmark UN Biodiversity Agreement, Montreal, QC, Canada.

3. Conserving Africa’s Wildlife and Wildlands through the COVID-19 Crisis and Beyond;Lindsey;Nat. Ecol. Evol.,2020

4. Redford, K.H., and Fearn, E. (2007). WCS Working Paper No. 32—Protected Areas and Human Livelihoods, Wildlife Conservation Society.

5. Assessing Nature’s Contributions to People;Pascual;Science,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3