Affiliation:
1. Laboratory Soete, Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Abstract
This work addresses the lack of focus on verification and comparison of existing fatigue damage accumulation and life prediction models on the basis of large and well-documented experiment datasets. Sixty-four constant amplitude, 54 two-level block loading, and 27 three-level block loading valid experiments were performed in order to generate an open-access, high-quality dataset that can be used as a benchmark for existing models. In the future, more experiments of various specimen geometries and loading conditions will be added. The obtained dataset was used for a study comparing five (non)linear fatigue damage and life prediction models. It is shown how the performance of several (non)linear damage models is strongly dependent on the considered material dataset and loading sequence. Therefore, it is important to verify models with a broad set of independent datasets, as many existing models show significant bias to certain datasets.
Subject
General Materials Science,Metals and Alloys
Reference34 articles.
1. Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern (Life Length of Roller Bearings or Durability of Ball Bearings);Palmgren;Z. Vereines Dtsch. Ingenieure (ZVDI),1924
2. Cumulative damage in Fatigue;Miner;J. Appl. Mech.,1945
3. A history of fatigue;Eng. Fract. Mech.,1996
4. Practical implementation of the double linear damage rule and damage curve approach for treating cumulative fatigue damage;Manson;Int. J. Fract.,1981
5. Method of analysis and prediction for variable amplitude fatigue crack growth;Porter;Eng. Fract. Mech.,1972
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献