Chemoprophylactic Assessment of Combined Intranasal SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase and Exonuclease Inhibition in Syrian Golden Hamsters
Author:
Gallardo-Toledo Eduardo12ORCID, Neary Megan12ORCID, Sharp Joanne12ORCID, Herriott Joanne12, Kijak Edyta12, Bramwell Chloe12ORCID, Curley Paul12, Arshad Usman12, Pertinez Henry12, Rajoli Rajith K. R.12ORCID, Valentijn Anthony12, Cox Helen12, Tatham Lee12ORCID, Kipar Anja34ORCID, Stewart James P.3ORCID, Owen Andrew12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK 2. Centre of Excellence in Long-Acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK 3. Department of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK 4. Laboratory for Animal Model Pathology, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract
Pibrentasvir (PIB) has been demonstrated to block exonuclease activity of the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase, protecting favipiravir (FVP) and remdesivir (RDV) from post-incorporation excision and eliciting antiviral synergy in vitro. The present study investigated the chemoprophylactic efficacy of PIB, FVP, RDV, FVP with PIB, or RDV with PIB dosed intranasally twice a day, using a Syrian golden hamster contact transmission model. Compared to the saline control, viral RNA levels were significantly lower in throat swabs in FVP (day 7), RDV (day 3, 5, 7), and RDV+PIB (day 3, 5) treatment groups. Similarly, findings were evident for nasal turbinate after PIB and RDV treatment, and lungs after PIB, FVP, and FVP+PIB treatment at day 7. Lung viral RNA levels after RDV and RDV+PIB treatment were only detectable in two animals per group, but the overall difference was not statistically significant. In situ examination of the lungs confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in all animals, except for one in each of the RDV and RDV+PIB treatment groups, which tested negative in all virus detection approaches. Overall, prevention of transmission was observed in most animals treated with RDV, while other agents reduced the viral load following contact transmission. No benefit of combining FVP or RDV with PIB was observed.
Funder
EPSRC NIH MRC BBSRC Innovate UK European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program Swiss National Science Foundation
Subject
Virology,Infectious Diseases
Reference39 articles.
1. Global emerging Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2: Impacts, challenges and strategies;Dhama;J. Infect. Public Health,2023 2. Meng, Z., Ma, D., Duan, S., Zhang, J., Yue, R., Li, X., Gao, Y., Zeng, F., Xu, X., and Jiang, G. (2022). Immunological Study of Combined Administration of SARS-CoV-2 DNA Vaccine and Inactivated Vaccine. Vaccines, 10. 3. Wang, Z., and Yang, L. (2023). The Therapeutic Potential of Natural Dietary Flavonoids against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Nutrients, 15. 4. Drugs repurposing for SARS-CoV-2: New insight of COVID-19 druggability;Debnath;Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther.,2022 5. The humoral response and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection;Qi;Nat. Immunol.,2022
|
|