Neoadjuvant Treatments for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where We Are and Where We Are Going

Author:

Coppola Alessandro1ORCID,Farolfi Tommaso23ORCID,La Vaccara Vincenzo3,Iannone Immacolata1,Giovinazzo Francesco4ORCID,Panettieri Elena5,Tarallo Mariarita1ORCID,Cammarata Roberto3,Coppola Roberto23ORCID,Caputo Damiano23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgey, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy

2. General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy

3. General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy

4. General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy

5. Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a challenging disease for the surgeon, oncologist, and radiation oncologist in both diagnostic and therapeutic settings. Surgery is currently the gold standard treatment, but the role of neoadjuvant treatment (NAD) is constantly evolving and gaining importance in resectable PDACs. The aim of this narrative review is to report the state of the art and future perspectives of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with PDAC. Methods: A PubMed database search of articles published up to September 2022 was carried out. Results: Many studies showed that FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel in a neoadjuvant setting had a relevant impact on overall survival (OS) for patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable PDAC without increasing post-operative complications. To date, there have not been many published multicentre randomised trials comparing upfront surgery with NAD in resectable PDAC patients, but the results obtained are promising. NAD in resectable PDAC showed long-term effective benefits in terms of median OS (5-year OS rate 20.5% in NAD group vs. 6.5% in upfront surgery). NAD could play a role in the treatment of micro-metastatic disease and lymph nodal involvement. In this scenario, given the low sensitivity and specificity for lymph-node metastases of radiological investigations, CA 19-9 could be an additional tool in the decision-making process. Conclusions: The future challenge could be to identify only selected patients who will really benefit from upfront surgery despite a combination of NAD and surgery.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3