Abstract
Circular economy is currently characterized by various definitions, measurement approaches, and critical analyses thereof coexisting alongside each other. Whether the concept eventually prevails or collapses will depend to some extent on our success in harmonizing assessment methods among public, scientific, and private institutions, as well as across different materials and scales. Therefore, in this article, we present a generic material flow analysis framework that might serve as a common basis for circularity assessment, and test it by means of three case studies. It proved impossible to eliminate all subjective assumptions when transforming a real complex system into the generic framework, especially regarding the definition of by-products. However, by introducing subsystems it is at least possible to make such assumptions transparent. Therefore, adequate comparability across regions, materials, and scales is provided. Moreover, the generic system allows for coupled analysis of multiple materials simultaneously so that interactions between them can be studied, as well and a deeper insight into overall sustainability of the system can be gained.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Waste Management and Disposal,General Materials Science
Reference80 articles.
1. The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity
2. Implementing Circular Economy Globally Makes Paris Targets Achievable;Blok,2016
3. Advancing Resource Efficiency in Europe: Indicators and Waste Policy Scenarios to Deliver a Resource Efficient and Sustainable Europe;Beasley,2014
4. The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals
5. Circular Economy Rebound
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献