New Designs of Spectacle Lenses for the Control of Myopia Progression: A Scoping Review
-
Published:2024-02-19
Issue:4
Volume:13
Page:1157
-
ISSN:2077-0383
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCM
Author:
Lupon Marta1ORCID, Nolla Carme2, Cardona Genis3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Vision, Optometry and Health (VOS), Department of Optics and Optometry, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Violinista Vellsolà 37, 08022 Terrassa, Spain 2. Terrassa School of Optics and Optometry (FOOT), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Violinista Vellsolà 37, 08022 Terrassa, Spain 3. Applied Optics and Image Processing Group (GOAPI), Department of Optics and Optometry, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Violinista Vellsolà 37, 08022 Terrassa, Spain
Abstract
Myopia control with new designs of spectacle lenses is a flourishing area of research. The present work reviews the effectiveness of new designs (DIMSs, defocus-incorporated multiple segments; CARE, cylindrical annular refractive element; HALs/SALs, highly/slightly aspherical lenslets; DOT, diffusion optics technology) aiming at slowing myopia progression. A search through the PubMed database was conducted for articles published between 1 January 2003 and 28 February 2023. Publications were included if they documented baseline central refraction (SER) and/or axial length (AL) data, and the change in these parameters, in myopic children wearing new designs of spectacle lenses (treatment group) compared to myopic children using single-vision lenses, SVLs (control group). The selection process revealed nine suitable articles. Comparing the mean and standard error values of the treatment and control groups, the highest differences in the change in the SER and AL were −0.80 (1.23) D [95% CI: −1.053 to −0.547; p < 0.001] and 0.35 (0.05) mm [95% CI: 0.252 to 0.448; p < 0.001], respectively; the effect of treatment provided by a HAL design, compared to SVLs, led to a deceleration of 54.8% in the SER and 50.7% in the AL. However, the heterogeneity of the results prevents reaching strong conclusions about the effectiveness of these new designs.
Funder
Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Reference39 articles.
1. Huang, H.M., Chang, D.S., and Wu, P.C. (2015). The Association between near work activities and myopia in children—A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10. 2. Yu, M., Hu, Y., Han, M., Song, J., Wu, Z., Xu, Z., Liu, Y., Shao, Z., Liu, G., and Yang, Z. (2023). Global risk factor analysis of myopia onset in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 18. 3. Zieliński, G., Matysik-Woźniak, A., Pankowska, A., Pietura, R., Rejdak, R., and Jonak, K. (2023). High myopia and thickness of extraocular and masticatory muscles-7T MRI, preliminary study. J. Clin. Med., 12. 4. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050;Holden;Ophthalmology,2016 5. Wang, J., Liu, J., Ma, W., Zhang, Q., Li, R., He, X., and Liu, L. (2021). Prevalence of myopia in 3–14-year-old Chinese children: A school-based cross-sectional study in Chengdu. BMC Ophthalmol., 21.
|
|