A Quantitative Model of Innovation Readiness in Urban Mobility: A Comparative Study of Smart Cities in the EU, Eastern Asia, and USA Regions

Author:

Ayfantopoulou Georgia1ORCID,Touloumidis Dimos1ORCID,Mallidis Ioannis2ORCID,Xenou Elpida1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Hellenic Institute of Transport, 57001 Thermi, Greece

2. Department of Statistical and Insurance Science, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece

Abstract

The smart cities paradigm has gained significant attention as a tool to address the multifaceted challenges posed by contemporary urban mobility systems. While cities are eager to integrate cutting-edge technologies to evolve into digital and intelligent hubs, they often deal with infrastructure and governance bottlenecks that prevent the rapid adoption of industry-driven innovations. This study introduces a three-step methodological approach to forecast a city’s innovation readiness in urban mobility, thus facilitating city-led innovation and identifying key areas within urban mobility systems that require attention. Initially, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken to ascertain the most impactful innovation indicators influencing a city’s ability to embrace new technologies. Subsequently, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to identify these indicators, highlighting the primary markers of innovation for each city. The final step involved the application of both random and fixed-effects regression models to quantify the influence of distinct unobserved variables—such as economic, cultural, and political factors—on the innovation readiness of various cities. The methodology’s effectiveness was tested using data from cities across diverse regions. The findings underscore that merely 7 out of 21 innovation indicators are critical for assessing a city’s innovation readiness. Moreover, the random-effects model was identified as the most suitable for capturing the nuances of unobserved variables in the studied cities. The innovation readiness scores at the city level revealed a diverse range, with cities like Madrid, Gothenburg, and Mechelen demonstrating high readiness, while others like Kalisz and Datong showed lower scores. This research contributes to the strategic planning for smart cities, offering a robust framework for policymakers to enhance innovation readiness and foster sustainable urban development, with a newfound emphasis on city-specific analysis.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Artificial Intelligence,Urban Studies

Reference71 articles.

1. On Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and smart cities;Allam;Cities,2019

2. Moustaka, V., Maitis, A., Vakali, A., and Anthopoulos, L.G. (2020, January 20–24). CityDNA dynamics: A model for smart city maturity and performance benchmarking. Proceedings of the Web Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.

3. Christopher, G. (2017). Public Administration and Information Technology, Springer.

4. Paving the way to smart sustainable cities: Transformation models and challenges;Ibrahim;J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag.,2016

5. Towards an effective framework for building Smart Cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco;Lee;Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3