Multifunctional Models in Digital and Physical Twinning of the Built Environment—A University Campus Case Study
-
Published:2024-03-26
Issue:2
Volume:7
Page:836-858
-
ISSN:2624-6511
-
Container-title:Smart Cities
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Smart Cities
Author:
Chen Genda1ORCID, Alomari Ibrahim1, Taffese Woubishet Zewdu2, Shi Zhenhua2ORCID, Afsharmovahed Mohammad Hossein1ORCID, Mondal Tarutal Ghosh2, Nguyen Son2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409-6510, USA 2. The Center for Intelligent Infrastructure, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409-6522, USA
Abstract
The digital twin (DT) concept has been developed for a single function in previous studies. This study aims to empower DTs with a layered integration of multifunctional models in the built environment. It develops a framework of DT modules in three hierarchical tiers: region, asset, and system; defines a new concept of the degree of digital twinning (DODT) to the real world by the number of models enabled by a common DT platform; and enables spatiotemporal analysis in multiple scales to couple nonstructural with structural building components and connect the built environment to planning constructions. While the asset and system DTs focus on the lifecycle management of buildings and infrastructure systems, the region DT addresses diverse modeling approaches for a comprehensive management of the built environment as demonstrated on a university campus. The DODT allows the value-driven digital replication of a physical twin at different levels. For the campus case study, the DODT is eight, for building and infrastructure planning, condition assessment of building envelopes, construction management for efficiency and quality, damage/cost scenario studies under earthquake events, energy harvesting efficiency, environmental planning for flood zone susceptibility, master planning for green space development, and security protocol development.
Funder
U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology INSPIRE University Transportation Center St. Louis University
Reference30 articles.
1. Gelernter, D.H. (1991). Mirror Worlds: Or the Day Software Puts the Universe in a Shoebox—How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean, Oxford University Press. 2. Grieves, M. (2002, January 31). Completing the cycle: Using PLM information in the sales and service functions. Proceedings of the Society of Manufacturing Engineering (SME) Management Forum, Troy, MI, USA. 3. Piascik, B., Vickers, J., Lowry, D., Scotti, S., Stewart, J., and Calomino, A. (2012). Materials, Structures, Mechanical Systems, and Manufacturing Road Map: Technology Area 12, NASA. 4. Kahlen, F.J., Flumerfelt, S., and Alves, A. (2017). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer International Publishing. 5. Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering;Schleich;CIRP Annu.,2017
|
|