Affiliation:
1. Lusófona University, BioRG-Bioengineering and Sustainability Research Group, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal
2. Lusófona University, CETRAD, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal
3. Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, 97590 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
4. Lusófona University, Civil Protection Department, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal
Abstract
Translation, adaptation, and validation of instruments for cross-cultural investigation requires a rigorous methodological procedure that should be carefully planned to deliver instruments with adequate reliability and validity. This process was applied to a questionnaire measuring Organizational Citizenship Behavior toward the Environment (OCBE), Organizational Identification (OI), Environmental Responsibility (ER), and Green Human Resources Management (GHRM) in Portuguese and Slovak organizations. Several methodological procedures for cross-cultural adaptation and validation of questionnaires were analyzed, most of which used independent translators, experts’ analysis, and backward translation to the original language. In the present study, a procedure adapted from Beaton et al. (2000) was applied successfully, and the blind backward translations; expert committee; and the two pretests to assess content validity, functional equivalence, and clarity proved to be worthy. The psychometric properties were measured using a sample from Portugal (N = 122) and Slovakia (N = 269). Although employees were perceiving neither a strong environmental responsibility of their organizations nor strong green human resources management, they identified themselves with the organizations and engaged in OCBEs. Comparing both countries, the factorial structure was remarkably similar, highlighting the eco-helping actions and eco-civic engagement of OCBEs. Comparing both countries, the factorial structure was remarkably similar, highlighting the eco-helping actions and eco-civic engagement of OCBEs. The results indicated that the translated instrument was functionally equivalent to the original one, valid (scale CVI/Ave > 0.83), and reliable (Scale Alpha > 0.733) for evaluating the effect of employee practices and organization management in promoting and supporting environmental sustainability.
Reference120 articles.
1. Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials;Acquadro;Value in Health,2008
2. Afshar Jahanshahi, Asghar, Brem, Alexander, and Bhattacharjee, Amitab (2017). Who Takes More Sustainability-Oriented Entrepreneurial Actions? The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Values, Beliefs and Orientations. Sustainability, 9.
3. Employees’ environmentally responsible behavior: The critical role of environmental justice perception;Maghsoudi;Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy,2021
4. The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: Recognizing country and industry differences;Ahmad;Journal of Operational Management,2003
5. Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus;Anwar;Journal of Cleaner Production,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献