Disclosure Compliance with Different ESG Reporting Guidelines: The Sustainability Ranking of Selected European and Hungarian Banks in the Socio-Economic Crisis Period

Author:

Tőzsér Dávid12ORCID,Lakner Zoltán3,Sudibyo Novy Anggraini4ORCID,Boros Anita56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem Sq. 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary

2. Circular Economy Analysis Center, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Páter Károly Str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary

3. Department of Agricultural Business and Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Páter Károly Str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary

4. Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Páter Károly Str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary

5. Lajos Lőrincz Department of Administrative Law, Ludovika University of Public Service (NKE), Ludovika Sq. 2, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary

6. Department of Agricultural Economics and Policy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Páter Károly Str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary

Abstract

As the relevant European Union directives require in-depth sustainability reporting from large institutions, banks are among the concerned with disclosure obligations. Several institutions prepare self-structured recommendations by which companies are indirectly fostered to make their operation more sustainable through reporting and to help compliance with the upcoming Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) regulations. However, in the preparation period, differences can be found in the actual sustainability disclosure practices across Europe (primarily by a western–eastern European relation). To examine this issue, this study aimed to investigate if there was any variation in the reporting compliance with aspects (key performance indicators—KPIs) of three reporting guidelines (Global Reporting Initiative—G4, Financial Services Sector Disclosures—GRI; Alliance for Corporate Transparency—ACT; ISO 26000:2010—ISO) between top European and Hungarian banks according to their 2021 sustainability/ESG reports, using content analysis-based disclosure scoring. The results revealed no significant differences among the general (aspect-pooled) scores for different guidelines, while the differences were significant for each guideline between the two bank groups. In the aspect-level evaluation, the European banks had higher scores in most cases, with the Hungarian banks receiving higher scores in 4 of 49 GRI, 1 of 16 ACT, and 2 of 37 ISO aspects. Significant correlations were indicated in disclosure score values between the two bank groups, which suggested similar preferences for the aspects demonstrated; however, elaboration levels differed. These findings showed that the European and Hungarian banks could be differentiated by their sustainability disclosure patterns. The results suggest a better CSRD-level preparedness of the top European banks than of the Hungarian ones, with the latter being introduced as a model group of the region. This reflects the need for more efficient adoption of best practices by financial institutions in the eastern parts of Europe.

Funder

NRDI

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference91 articles.

1. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K., Kouretas, Georgios P., and De Simone, Francisco Nadal (2023). The performance of the euro area banking system: The pandemic in perspective. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.

2. Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: A scientometric review of global trends;Ahmad;Environment, Development and Sustainability,2023

3. ESG performance in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-country evidence;Khatib;Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2023

4. Alliance for Corporate Transparency (2023, June 01). The Alliance for Corporate Transparency Research Report 2019: An Analysis of the Sustainability Reports of 1000 Companies Pursuant to the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive. Available online: https://www.sustentia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2019-Research-Report-Alliance-for-Corporate-Transparency_compressed.pdf.

5. Political connection, ownership concentration, and corporate social responsibility disclosure quality (CSRD): Empirical evidence from Jordan;Ananzeh;International Journal of Disclosure and Governance,2023

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: Insights from large Spanish companies;Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management;2024-06-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3