Does CEO Power Affect Manufacturing Firms’ Green Innovation and Organizational Performance? A Mediational Approach

Author:

Yan Qiuyan1,Yan Jing2,Zhang Duo3,Bi Shuochen4,Tian Ying5,Mubeen Riaqa6ORCID,Abbas Jaffar7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China

2. School of Business, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China

3. International Institute of Culture and Education, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150038, China

4. D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA

5. School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China

6. School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

7. School of Media and Communication (SMC), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU), Shanghai 200240, China

Abstract

In this research work, we investigate the direct impact of CEO power on corporate performance, as well as the mediating role of green innovation in this hypothesized relationship. In this study, we use observation data collected from 780 listed manufacturing companies, explicitly focusing on the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE), and adopt a GMM (generalized method of moments) model for testing our hypotheses. The results of this research show that CEO power has a negative impact on sustainable corporate performance, while the mediating role of green innovation positively and completely regulates the effect of CEO power on enterprises’ sustainable performance. This study adds novelty to the literature as it explores the influence of green innovation in manufacturing enterprises on CEO power and firm performance and observes the direct impact of green innovation and CEO power on sustainable business performance. The results of this study show that a green innovation strategy significantly affects CEO power and manufacturing firm performance and that companies that adopt green initiatives can increase corporate value and improve their reputation among stakeholders. The conclusions of this study have important implications for both theory and practice in this field.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference84 articles.

1. Solomon, J. (2007). Corporate Governance and Accountability, John Wiley & Sons.

2. Apprentice, departure, and demotion: An examination of the three types of CEO–board chair separation;Krause;Acad. Manag. J.,2013

3. CEO duality and firm performance in the US restaurant industry: Moderating role of restaurant type;Guillet;Int. J. Hosp. Manag.,2013

4. Corporate governance and Tobin’s Q as a measure of organizational performance;Singh;Br. J. Manag.,2018

5. Board leadership structure and firm performance;Kang;Corp. Gov. Int. Rev.,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3