Acidity Is an Excellent Marker of Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
-
Published:2024-01-25
Issue:3
Volume:13
Page:688
-
ISSN:2077-0383
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCM
Author:
Judl Tobiáš1, Popelka Stanislav1ORCID, Tomšík Elena2ORCID, Hrubý Martin2ORCID, Daniel Matěj3, Fojt Jaroslav4ORCID, Melicherčík Pavel1, Landor Ivan1, Jahoda David1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopaedics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and University Hospital in Motol, V Úval 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Czech Republic 2. Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry CAS, Heyrovsého nám. 2, 162 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic 3. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Technická 4, 166 07 Prague 6, Czech Republic 4. Department of Metals and Corrosion Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of joint replacement infection is a difficult clinical challenge that often occurs when the implant cannot be salvaged. We hypothesize that the pH value of synovial fluid could be an important indicator of the inflammatory status of the joint. However, in the literature, there is a lack of data on the pH changes in hip and knee joint replacements and their relation to infection and implant failure. In this study, we aimed to measure the pH levels of synovial fluid in patients with hip and knee joint replacements. We also investigated the potential of pH measurement as a diagnostic tool for joint replacement infection. In this study, we recorded the pH values to be 7.55 and 7.46 in patients where Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified as the cause of the prosthetic joint infection. We attribute this to the different environments created by this specific bacterium. In other cases where the pH was higher, chronic mitigated infections were diagnosed, caused by strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiase, and coagulase negative staphylococcus. Materials and methods: In our cohort of 155 patients with implanted hip (THA; n = 85) or knee (TKA; n = 70) joint replacements, we conducted a prospective study with a pH measurement. Out of the whole cohort, 44 patients had confirmed joint replacement infection (28.4%) (44/155). In 111 patients, infection was ruled out (71.6%) (111/155). Joint replacement infection was classified according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) from 2018. Based on the measured values, we determined the cut-off level for the probability of ongoing inflammation. We also determined the sensitivity and specificity of the measurement. Results: The group of patients with infection (n = 44) had a significantly lower synovial fluid pH (pH = 6.98 ± 0.48) than the group of patients with no infection (n = 111, pH = 7.82 ± 0.29, p < 0.001). The corresponding median pH values were 7.08 for the patients with infection and 7.83 for the patients with no infection. When we determined the cut-off level of pH 7.4, the sensitivity level of infected replacements was 88.6%, and the specificity level of the measurement was 95.5%. The predictive value of a positive test was 88.6%, and the predictive value of a negative test was 95.5%. Conclusions: Our results confirm that it is appropriate to include a pH measurement in the diagnostic spectrum of hip and knee replacements. This diagnostic approach has the potential to provide continuous in vivo feedback, facilitated by specialized biosensors. The advantage of this method is the future incorporation of a pH-detecting sensor into intelligent knee and hip replacements that will assess pH levels over time. By integrating these biosensors into intelligent implants, the early detection of joint replacement infections could be achieved, enhancing proactive intervention strategies.
Funder
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
Reference34 articles.
1. Callaghan, J.J., Rosenberg, A.G., Rubash, H.E., Simonian, P.T., and Wickiewicz, T.L. (2003). The Adult Knee, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2. Current Strategies for Prevention of Prosthetic Joint Infection;Gallo;Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cechoslov.,2006 3. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Incidence, Timing, and Predisposing Factors;Pulido;Clin. Orthop.,2008 4. The infected total hip arthroplasty;Salvati;Instr. CourseLect,2003 5. Executive Summary: Diagnosis and Management of Prosthetic Joint Infection: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America;Douglas;Clin. Infect. Dis.,2013
|
|