How Reliable Is Breast Volume Assessment When the Patient Is Lying Flat?—Volumetric Assessment of Breast Volume Using a Vectra H2 Handheld Device in Different Positions

Author:

Macek Aljosa1,Leitsch Sebastian1,Koban Konstantin Christoph2ORCID,Mayer Julius Michael3ORCID,Loucas Rafael1,Holzbach Thomas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Thurgau Hospital Group, 8500 Frauenfeld, Switzerland

2. Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital LMU Munich, 80339 Munich, Germany

3. Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

(1) Background: Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric assessment is receiving increased recognition in breast surgery. It is commonly used for preoperative planning and postoperative control with the patient standing in an upright position. Recently, intraoperative use was evaluated with patients in the supine position. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the volumetric changes in 3D surface imaging depending on the patient’s position. (2) Methods: 3D volumetric analysis was performed using a Vectra-H2 device with patients in standing, sitting, and supine positions. A total of 100 complete datasets of female breasts were included in the study. The measured volumes of each evaluated breast (n = 200) were compared between the three positions. (3) Results: The mean difference between the 3D volumetric assessments of the sitting and standing positions per breast was 7.15 cc and, thus, statistically insignificant (p = 0.28). However, the difference between supine and standing positions, at 120.31 cc, was significant (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: The 3D volumetric assessment of breasts in the supine position did not statistically correlate with the validated assessment of breast volume in the standing position while breast volume in the sitting position is reliable and correlates with the assessment of a standing patient. We conclude that intraoperative volumetric assessment should be performed with patients in an upright sitting position.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference26 articles.

1. Population analysis of the perfect breast: A morphometric analysis;Mallucci;Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,2014

2. Clinical Assessment of Breast Volume: Can 3D Imaging Be the Gold Standard?;Killaars;Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open,2020

3. Improving symmetry of nipple–areola complex (NAC) position in reduction mammoplasty using laser level projection;Holzbach;J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg.,2023

4. Automated Breast Volume Assessment Derived From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Compared to Mastectomy Specimen Weight and Its Applications in Cosmetic Optimisation;Munir;Cureus,2021

5. Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: A literature review of techniques;Chae;Gland Surg.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3