Influence of Virtual Reality on User Evaluation of Prototypes in the Development Process—A Comparative Study with Control Rooms for Onshore Drilling Rigs

Author:

Hinricher Niels1ORCID,König Simon1,Schröer Chris1ORCID,Backhaus Claus2

Affiliation:

1. Center for Ergonomics and Medical Engineering, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, Bürgerkamp 3, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany

2. Institute of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technical University Berlin, Fasanenstraße 1, 10623 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

User evaluations of prototypes in virtual reality (VR) offer high potential for products that require resource-intensive prototype construction, such as drilling rigs. This study examined whether the user evaluation of a VR prototype for controlling an onshore drilling rigproduces results comparable to an evaluation in the real world. Using a between-subject design, 16 drilling experts tested a prototype in VR and reality. The experts performed three different work processes and evaluated their satisfaction based on task performance, user experience, and usability via standardized questionnaires. A test leader evaluated the effectiveness of the work process execution using a 3-level rating scheme. The number of user interactions and time on task were recorded. There were no significant differences in the effectiveness, number of interactions required, perceived usability, and satisfaction with respect to task performance. In VR, the drilling experts took significantly more time to complete tasks and rated the efficiency of the VR prototype significantly higher. Overall, the real-world evaluation provided more insights into prototype optimization. Nevertheless, several usability issues have been identified in VR. Therefore, user evaluations in VR are particularly suitable in the early development phases to identify usability issues, without the need to produce real prototypes.

Funder

Bentec GmbH Drilling & Oilfield Systems

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference58 articles.

1. (2019). Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Part 220: Processes for Enabling, Executing and Assessing Human-Centred Design within Organizations (Standard No. ISO 9241-220:2019).

2. Determining fidelity of mixed prototypes: Effect of media and physical interaction;Zhou;Appl. Ergon.,2019

3. Virtual prototyping and testing of in-vehicle interfaces;Bullinger;Ergonomics,2003

4. Fischer, H., and Hess, S. (2019). Mensch und Computer 2019—Usability Professionals, Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. Und German UPA e.V.

5. De Freitas, F.V., Gomes, M.V.M., and Winkler, I. (2022). Benefits and Challenges of Virtual-Reality-Based Industrial Usability Testing and Design Reviews: A Patents Landscape and Literature Review. Appl. Sci., 12.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3