Comparison between Machine Learning and Physical Models Applied to the Evaluation of Co-Seismic Landslide Hazard

Abstract

A comparative methodology between advanced statistical tools and physical-based methods is carried out to ensure their reliability and objectivity for the evaluation of co-seismic landslide hazard maps. To do this, an inventory of landslides induced by the 2011 Lorca earthquake is used to highlight the usefulness of these methods to improve earthquake-induced landslide hazard analyses. Various statistical models, such as logistic regression, random forest, artificial neural network, and support vector machine, have been employed for co-seismic landslide susceptibility mapping. The results demonstrate that machine learning techniques using principal components (especially, artificial neural network and support vector machine) yield better results compared to other models. In particular, random forest shows poor results. Artificial neural network and support vector machine approaches are compared to the results of physical-based methods in the same area, suggesting that machine learning methods can provide better results for developing co-seismic landslide susceptibility maps. The application of different advanced statistical models shows the need for validation with an actual inventory of co-seismic landslides to ensure reliability and objectivity. In addition, statistical methods require a great amount of data. The results establish effective land planning and hazard management strategies in seismic areas to minimize the damage of future co-seismic landslides.