Affiliation:
1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Abstract
Commercial aircraft are becoming highly automated, but pilots must take control if automation systems fail. Failures can be due to known limitations (system-limit failures) or unforeseen malfunctions (system-malfunction failures). This study quantifies the impact of these failures on response performance and monitoring behavior, considering four levels of operational proficiency. In a flight simulator with pitch, roll, and yaw, 24 participants experienced both types of failures at different proficiency levels. The results showed that system-malfunction failure response times were 3.644, 2.471, 2.604, and 4.545 times longer than system-limit failure response times at proficiency levels 1 to 4. Monitoring behaviors (fixation duration, saccade duration, fixation rate) differed between failure types and proficiency levels. Considering these differences in response performance and monitoring behavior between failure types, it is important to differentiate between system-limit and system-malfunction failures in the literature and not overlook the influence of proficiency. Furthermore, due to the unpredictability of system-malfunctions, it is crucial to develop pilots’ psychological models and training theories regarding the operation of automated systems, fostering their core competency to excel in handling unknown situations.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference34 articles.
1. AAIBE (2019). Aircraft Accident Investigation Preliminary Report: B737-8 (MAX) Registered ET-AVJ.
2. National Transportation Safety Board (2014). Accident Report NTSB/AAR-14/01 PB2014-105984, Descent below Visual Glidepath and Impact with Seawall Asiana Airlines Flight 214 Boeing 777-200ER.
3. Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2011). ATSB Transport Safety Report, Aviation Occurrence Investigation AO-2008-070, In-Flight Upset 154 km West of Learmonth, WA 7 October 2008 VH-QPA Airbus A330-303.
4. FAA (2023). Code of Federal Regulations Title 14, Section 91.3—Responsibility and Authority of the Pilot in Command.
5. An Ethical Inquiry of the Effect of Cockpit Automation on the Responsibilities of Airline Pilots: Dissonance or Meaningful Control?;Holford;J. Bus. Ethics,2022