Impact of a Static Magnetic Field on Early Osseointegration: A Pilot Study in Canines

Author:

Michels Roberta123ORCID,Kampleitner Carina345ORCID,Dobsak Toni35,Doppelmayer Kevin35ORCID,Heimel Patrick345ORCID,Lettner Stefan35ORCID,Tangl Stefan35ORCID,Gruber Reinhard56,Benfatti César Augusto Magalhães1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), School of Dentistry (ODT), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis 88036-020, Brazil

2. Robert K. Schenk Laboratory of Oral Histology, Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

3. Karl Donath Laboratory for Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

4. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, 1200 Vienna, Austria

5. Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, 1200 Vienna, Austria

6. Department of Oral Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

A static magnetic field generated by neodymium–iron–boron (NdFeB) magnets placed in the inner cavity of dental implants can enhance bone regeneration in rabbits. It is, however, unknown whether static magnetic fields support osseointegration in a canine model. We therefore determined the potential osteogenic effect of implants carrying NdFeB magnets inserted in the tibia of six adult canines in the early stages of osseointegration. Here, we report that after 15 days of healing, magnetic and regular implants showed a high variation with a median new bone-to-implant contact (nBIC) in the cortical (41.3% and 7.3%) and the medullary (28.6% and 44.8%) region, respectively. Consistently, the median new bone volume/tissue volume (nBV/TV) in the cortical (14.9% and 5.4%) and the medullary (22.2% and 22.4%) region were not significantly different. One week of healing only resulted in negligible bone formation. These findings suggest that considering the large variation and the pilot nature of this study, magnetic implants failed to support peri-implant bone formation in a canine model.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference21 articles.

1. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions;Buser;Periodontol. 2000,2017

2. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period;Branemark;Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Suppl.,1977

3. Research on implants and osseointegration;Guglielmotti;Periodontol. 2000,2019

4. Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone;Kusumbe;Nature,2014

5. Osteogenicity of autologous bone transplants in the goat;Kruyt;Transplantation,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3